Staff recommends that the commission make a specified findings to approve this project. Thank you. Im available for any questions you might have. Thank you. Project sponsor, please. Good afternoon, commissioners. Thank you very much for allowing us to present this afternoon. My name is bob tanedler. It is my pleasure to be before you to introduce the tehama [speaker not understood]. Architect our Landscape Architect from cmg Landscape Architecture, Isabelle Wade has helped us plan our plaza and open space integration. Brad paul has helped drive our Community Outreach. Wane hu has helped us understand the economic benefits of the project to the city and county of San Francisco. Sam louder has acted a senior [speaker not understood] and guided us through government interaction and make sure i dont embarrass myself up here today. Susan yogi and david from acom have handled Environmental Review brilliantly and Andrew Junius is our esteemed counsel. All of our team is here to answer questio
All of the three proposals were inside of the original estimate. So the staff is really quite comfortable to recommend that the board authorizes the contract for 9. 2 million to anvil builders. Are there any questions . I just have one quick question. And so, being that you had three applicants but two were not responsive, because they didnt submit all of the required documents . Did we get an understanding as to why that happened during the process . It would appear that that would, pure laziness, frankly and it was obvious in the documents and they signed off the check as to say that they had done all of this and provided it and yet it is like fly america, all of these documents which were required, were just not signed and submitted. A successful one has every single piece and i considered the longer one than any of the others. Thank you. Any other questions . Okay. Move approval. Yes. The first and second and members of the public, wishing to address you under this item . Director
In the bay area, you can add a third. Thats toll i hope crease. Golden gate bridge district considering raising the toll on the same span to 8 dollars per trip. 2000 dollars a year if you drive it ever day. Wayne is on the story. He. Once you see it you will have a realizeship with it. Whether a tourist taking pictures or a commuter almost taking it for granted. Until you pay the toll of course the. Generally people prefer not to pay more for something if you dont have to. In the case of the Golden Gate Bridge it appears they will. Executives now have 5 options which could raise toll to as much as 8 dollars within 5 years. Sundz like a lot. Why do they need to raise i it. They said when they raised it to 6 dollars that was going to be it. Good question. District manager knew it would be comin coming. Things cost more today than they did 6 years ago. We spend about half of our toll to fund transit. Bus operation. That takes one and a half lanes of traffic off the bridge during rush hour
If you have a lot of causalities two is okay. But the number of people adversely impacted by dedicate it creates an impact of loss of human life its prefer able to use a hire classification of 3, in fact, it was done to the modern art we believe that the classification should be used as 3 not 2 and for that reason if you do use the classification of 3 the capacity of the facility must be higher than contemplated when you use a lower classification so because of the unique classifications of this facility and its location to the pg e building we believe that the new standards of San Francisco require a heightened design. So that moongdz you minimize Property Damage and you undercut the realignscy program that San Francisco has spent a lot of money pursing. We saw to a smaller degree at northridge in 193 and nooud entire neighborhoods became ghost turns down. A perfectly Good Building was red tagged. The entire neighborhood was disputing shut down that diversifying contract is not resili
Because those policies but because of the proximity of those essential pg e workstation located on the cooperate. This has not been well addressed in the opposing papers. This pg e facility is the principal source of electrical power for the downtown San Francisco business district. Theres no back up. This is pg e recommendation when they were working on an upgrade. To the submittals they estimated if that facility goes down there will be 150 million lost in San Francisco. My clients ray a half a block away would lose power and not be operational. It turns out in the cpc filing if this facility goes down activist its called the embarcadero station the loss from San Francisco will be 3. 5 billion. We have an important facility located next to the property highrise. We believe under the circumstances in addition to the new Policies Incorporated in your general plan the proximity to the pg e facility requires is a different occupancy clarification welcome back be used such as used was mod