Page 3 - Transit Task Force News Today

I dont accept this process as being the way we should be doing transportation in San Francisco and i i cant support this item. You touched on [inaudible] mull symposiums and its a big problem, not just here but in a lot of places. I want to recap some of these issues [inaudible] large scale with brt represents in the transbay type projects but things should go faster. Clearly seqa is a huge area of this. I do wanna note in the prior presentation mark indicated that does seem to be growing moment...

Is to take vague of the federal map legislation 3 will help us to identify the local identification earlier and keep it within the document. A significant amount of effort was exerted in the vanessa document after the circulation and incorporating that into the final document we can save a significant amount of time. We think the project will allow early deployment of side running improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta...

Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding of the rapid bus transit so we you shouldnt have to have the same discussions oh, again. Another part that wi...

Involved with the item open gary boulevard since 1986 and back then i was appointed to the gary Transit Task Force to look at the feasibility of the gary light rail system and this sort of thing but it was put in the sales tax passage. The gary light rail project is the only project that was grandfathered. And the gary Rapid Transit project is supposed to be rail ready. Also you have to remember that its a central sub by the way, theres a stop at the union square and theres a spur at union squar...

Improvements in the inner gary and those could be deployed that eventually well have the Service Provided peril. Mta and ta are embracing the idea so the people can see the improvements. And mta is very focused on the low cost improvements immediately fund the certification of the environmental document. In fact, mta has announced the goals by mid 2014 in the mid gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the pote...

During the past it is very beneficial to have a large number of Board Members really putting the spotlight because project delivery is effective at the staff level and those are things we need to advocate but to have the clear board accountability is something weve looking forward before you decide to speak we have comments as well commissioner weaning. Thank you. Has been noted im commissioner and commissioner chu has raised some concerns at the finance committee. Im a huge supporter of bart an...

Well. Were definitely looking out for ways we can compress the schedule. And i appreciate there is some thinking on this. Is there a written analysis or have you form alized what youre trying to do to make sure youre standing to your schedule . We can provide a written process. Right now were trying to build off the momentum from the mexico city brt trip. Were working with your offices and trying to meet with mta and director risk and this is a conversation about how can we support the city, how...

Gary area. Looking at oiflg a locally identified alternative in the document there are a couple of options that we think have the potential of becoming the alternative. And their depektd here. It would include the option to provide a filed at fillmore in order to reconnect the community that maybe as much of a land use and Community Issue as a transportation issue by those optioned will allow this to be done. Side lynn b r t would be provided and the center lane b r t to 22 avenue and a consolid...

Why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets be clear this isnt about the mta this is a boarder issue why should i trust the process in general. This is not a hit or criticism directed at the city staff if you feel compelled to stand up. But back to this particular project we also at that time, point have had the ability to absorb some of the lessons and we have some understanding...

My question is this is a nice power point presentation why should we and i guess it states were going to trim two years off the delivery why should we have confidence this is going to actually happen he in terms of that shorter deliver process. Given the challenges that mta has had and in delivering the projects in a time effective way why should we be confident this is real. Thats a question to staff. Through the chair thats an excellent quo. Basically youre saying why should you trust us lets ...