some of our colleagues in the media might be looking at themselves a little funny. tucker: yeah, i think they are beyond that. [laughs]se brit: that s too much to hope for? tucker: it s way too much. in 15 seconds, is that enough for aoc and the squad, do you think? brit: i don t think anything is enough for aoc anden the squad, who are incoherent when you are talking actions and policies. so, there you are.she will nevey indicate those people. cash it lplacate those people. she will be able to satisfy, for now, at least, a large portion of her caucus, and shall continue to be able to protect her vulnerable members and other members who are having to take a hard vote on this. tucker: boy, that s a tight rope. i m glad i m not her. thank you for your analysis. great to see you. brit: you too. b it s the one that s it for us. boy, that hour passed quickly.tn things are really crazy.
united states based on something can t articulate is of dirty political tactic and this should not be anything that the democrats want to go in front of. and if anyonee is paying attention then they should not vote for this party in 2020 simply because they hate the rule of law and are only interested in power because of their own purposes. tucker: i got that. but i m thinking if i m the president talking out of the ukraine and he sang at like $400 million of military data, the first answer is, no. get it from the e.u., we won t pay for that. and second why did you shut down the investigation to the company that was paying all this money to the vice president son? you can have multiple subjects of discussion in a single conversation. i think as adults we do that all the time and probably president trump with the head of state, and he doesn t talk to him every day. tucker: great to see you tonight, thank you.
this is not just a coinciden coe at this point. it s remarkable. you could ask about the dichotomies about what joe biden did but you don t ask that. i was reading a story, he was requesting help from a foreign government to tar or smear his opponent. that s what the dossier is. the whole dossier is and then it was repackaged as a dossier with just opposition research from russian intelligence to smear tucker: whatever they are accusing you of doing is exactly what they are doing themselves. chris plant, great to see you. boy, and has that been a weird day of news. still not exactly sure what s going on and that is why we are so grateful to have brit hume,
have course need to do is to tackle it smartly, but if we end up spending five or ten or 16% of gdp to avoid this tiny problem, then we are really screwed. tucker: is there any is there a scientific consensus that we know exactly how to arrest climate change? that we know the precise formula that we are actually in control of the climate? look, there is a tendency for us to tell everything that you see is due to climate change, and that s obviously wrong, but there are some very clear indicators that we are causing higher temperatures, causing more heat waves, that we are causing sea level rise and to a certain extent it actually makes sense to cut back, some of the easy emissions to cut, but we should also recognize, and that s what that swedish girl that you showed before she doesn t and she probably hasn t heard that fossil fuels and the availability of easily accessible energy makes people much better off.
mankind. meanwhile, the democrat party can t even be bothered to clean up mountains of festering effluvium is in cities that they run with one party control. and for people who actually do care about the environment, they would be advised to think twice before they empower a party so strongly. look at china. china is one party rule and they are the world s biggest polluters by far. tucker: so i was we haven t had time to do this, but just spend a day with the camera at alexandria ocasio-cortez s congressional district. is it a green thriving clean place? no. it s a filthy place. so when you preside over that, how dare you lecture me about the environment. exactly. and look at the hypocrisies t? we can t even necessarily call it hypocrisy becausely president obama may have spent $15 million on a seaside mansion that apparently every burger you