Of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to remind them that this sort of anti building action we are taking Public Comment on the items being proposed for continuance. This is jet this is not general Public Comment period that will come up shortly. Okay. Commissioner moore. Im sorry, moved to continue. On that motion to continue items one and two acknowledge the wi
Item a1, 2017008431drp 2220 turk boulevard near the corner of nido avenue; lot 032 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of Building Permit application no. 2017. 0612. 9029 for the addition of three accessory dwelling units within the existing item a2, 2017008412drp. 2230 turk boulevard at the corner of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to re
The director of transportation. Before i get into that whole presentation, i want to call up supervisor aaron peskin to speak and give his presentation, then we will move through the director to do presentations, and many others want to recognize you today. Supervisor peskin . Thank you, vice vice chair. Commissioners, director, and to the remarkable staff of the sfmta, my name is aaron peskin and im not here in my capacity as a supervisor, that will happen later. I am here in my capacity as chair of the littleknown Funding Agency called the San Francisco county transportation authority. Momentarily to be joined by our executive director, tilly chang, for the purpose of saying what is rarely said to the public, which are words of sincere and profound thanks to our outgoing director, address given, and to acknowledge and celebrate and ruskin, and the fact that i have been a constant pain in his but. [laughter] so lets be real. This is the toughest job in San Francisco government, maybe
Theyre doing will be for naught. We as the city, including s. F. P. U. C. , but external of silos, like clean power s. F. , we need to be looking at what we want to get to. [buzzer] and how all of the cylinders of the city can work to get there. That will be the same whether it is clean power s. F. , whether it is public power. I think it is time to break out from letting one part of the City Government to sit on this issue, which has been happening for six, seven, eight years. We need to have this happen at the 30,000foot view. Im hoping that the [buzzer] chairwoman thank you very much. Any other Public Comment . Seeing none, the Public Comment is now closed. Mr. Clerk, can you please call item number seven. Item seven is Public Comment. Chairwoman any members of the public like to make comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is now closed. Mr. Clerk, item number eight. Item eight is future agenda items . Chairwoman any future items to note . Mr. Global. I want to bring it to everyones
They were involved in Capital Planning, they also told us we needed to delay our discussion of local integrative buildout that wed been talking about before i got involved in 2013, until that was done. Those were done. It didnt happen. And were now on the next cycle of those. And i can only imagine that were going to hear folks wanting to wait for the first s. F. P. U. C. Plan, and for them to put out their getting to 2030 i. R. P. , before we start looking at what we might like to do. You know, if we take over pg es infrastructure, clean power s. F. Wont even exist. So all of the stuff theyre doing will be for naught. We as the city, including s. F. P. U. C. , but external of silos, like clean power s. F. , we need to be looking at what we want to get to. [buzzer] and how all of the cylinders of the city can work to get there. That will be the same whether it is clean power s. F. , whether it is public power. I think it is time to break out from letting one part of the City Government