some cases on a much shorter tether than what they had before.— than what they had before. can you rule out sending _ than what they had before. can you rule out sending us _ than what they had before. can you rule out sending us troops - rule out sending us troops to ukraine? _ rule out sending us troops to ukraine? ithink rule out sending us troops to ukraine? i think the president has already— ukraine? i think the president has already spoken to that. as you know, we already _ already spoken to that. as you know, we already do have advisers and some trainers _ we already do have advisers and some trainers in _ we already do have advisers and some trainers in ukraine. the}r we already do have advisers and some trainers in ukraine.— trainers in ukraine. they are still there at their _ trainers in ukraine. they are still there at their work. _ trainers in ukraine. they are still there at their work. if _ trainers in ukraine. they are still there at their work. if you're - trainers in ukraine. they are still there at their work. if you're not| there at their work. if you're not willin: to there at their work. if you're not willing to send _ there at their work. if you're not willing to send troops _ there at their work. if you're not willing to send troops to - there at their work. if you're not. willing to send troops to ukraine, what _ willing to send troops to ukraine, what makes you think that this is going _ what makes you think that this is going to — what makes you think that this is going to deter vladimir putin? there is a whole package _ going to deter vladimir putin? there is a whole package of— going to deter vladimir putin? tues is a whole package of things the administration is looking at to try to deter vladimir putin from another incursion, including very severe economic consequences. this is... this is about sending a strong message that we are committed to nato and we are committed to assuring that our allies have the capabilities they need in case they need to defend themselves. ikilim capabilities they need in case they need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips _ need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips or _ need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips or yell _ need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips or yell i _ need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips or yell i am _ need to defend themselves. num it to send these trips or yell i am not - send these trips or yell i am not aware _ send these trips or yell i am not aware of— send these trips or yell i am not aware of any such requirement at this point — aware of any such requirement at this point. we have long—standing commitments to the nato response force _ commitments to the nato response force was — commitments to the nato response force was. will commitments to the nato response force was. ~ ., ., ., ., ,
what this relationship with the asian tour does is it gives legitimacy to the saudi arabian project, if you like. and that looks like that will go that much deeper. with the relationship to the asian tour, they have world ranking points. that is a key currency for any circuit in the world game. from there there is the potential to extrapolate further and potentially set up some kind of formula i extrapolate further and potentially set up some kind of formula 1 style golf super league. certainly the depth of the pockets from saudi arabia make it possible to then turn the heads of the biggest names in the heads of the biggest names in the game. the heads of the biggest names in the name. �* , . , the heads of the biggest names in theuame. �* , . , , the game. and with such big prize mone on the game. and with such big prize money on offer. _ the game. and with such big prize money on offer, how— the game. and with such big prize money on offer, how many - the game. and with such big prize | money on offer, how many players do you think will wrestle with the morals over going to saudi funded advance? everything amnesty international has to say about human rights issue, sports washing. there are players — rights issue, sports washing. there are players that — rights issue, sports washing. there are players that have _ rights issue, sports washing. tues are players that have expressed their disinterest because of that
the way _ have to see what he is going to say. the way our — have to see what he is going to say. the way our pay is determined is pay review— the way our pay is determined is pay review bodies, in our case the teacher— review bodies, in our case the teacher review body makes an assessment. i give evidence to the assessment. ! give evidence to the body— assessment. ! give evidence to the body every— assessment. i give evidence to the body every year for the last ten years — body every year for the last ten years and _ body every year for the last ten years. and they want to give bigger pay rises _ years. and they want to give bigger pay rises than the government wants because _ pay rises than the government wants because they look at the problems of teacher— because they look at the problems of teacher recruitment and retention, and they— teacher recruitment and retention, and they think there is a need for a pay rise _ and they think there is a need for a pay rise so — and they think there is a need for a pay rise. so we want to know from the chancellor whether he is going to lead _ the chancellor whether he is going to lead the review bodies make free decisions, _ to lead the review bodies make free decisions, and whether he is going to find _ decisions, and whether he is going to find the — decisions, and whether he is going to find the decisions they make. those _ to find the decisions they make. those are — to find the decisions they make. those are the steps we need. there are two parts _ those are the steps we need. there are two parts to _ those are the steps we need. there are two parts to your— those are the steps we need. there are two parts to your question. i those are the steps we need. tues are two parts to your question. what i am curious to know is how much do you think teachers's pay needs to go up you think teachers's pay needs to go up by? you think teachers's pay needs to go u- b ? ~ you think teachers's pay needs to go u. b ? . you think teachers's pay needs to go u . b ? . , . , . up by? well, the pay cut since 22 and is on the _ up by? well, the pay cut since 22 and is on the order— up by? well, the pay cut since 22 and is on the order of— up by? well, the pay cut since 22 and is on the order of 1596. i up by? well, the pay cut since 22 and is on the order of 1596. -- i up by? well, the pay cut since 22 i and is on the order of 1596. -- 2010. and is on the order of 15%. —— 2010. we would _ and is on the order of 15%. —— 2010. we would like — and is on the order of 15%. —— 2010. we would like to see a move towards that. we would like to see a move towards that you _ we would like to see a move towards that. you need a pay rise that is more _ that. you need a pay rise that is more than — that. you need a pay rise that is more than 4% if inflation is running