or another lawyer boeing in there under oath to say why it is unfair? tony sayeg will respond to the letter this evening. i don t want to get ahead of the white house. i want to point out in a regular judicial proceeding, the prosecutor and judge are not the same person. that is what jerry nadler are doing. they are the prosecutor, the judge, or a jury. that is not a separation of powers. that is not a fair and accurate process. if they wanted to seek truth and infairness they would allow impartial arbiter to come in. they would no act as prosecutor and judge at the same time. that is why if it does get to the trial in the senate, why president trump said bring it on, at least there would be a impartial judge and it would be more like a regular trial. ed: jenna, i have got about a minute. another democrat. you mentioned schiff, nadler. the third key one is maybe nancy pelosi the speaker. months ago she said i will only move forward if it is bipartisan. i believe you mean it is not bi
at first baptist church of dallas. how americans can maintain and restore their faith in bod upcoming this christmas season. t with tums smoothies. tum tum-tum tum tums for black friday weekend! at petsmart save 40% on all holiday toys and apparel. select top paw beds are only $9.99. plus, milk bone marosnacks are only $7.99! this black friday weekend. at petsmart!
then they will vote on those findings tuesday to get it over to the house judiciary committee on wednesday when they start considering articles of impeachment and have their first hearing. joining me now to set it up, jenna ellis, senior legal advisor to president trump s re-election campaign. a constitutional law attorney. thanks for coming in. great to see you, ed. ed: what do you expect from this hearing, specifically jerry nadler insisting this is just a search for the truth? the president s team buying that? not at all and so the really interesting phrasing in that letter is that jerry nadler is asking the president whether he intends to exercise specific privileges. that tells you all you need to know the bias of this, that it is not actually providing the president with rebust due process. all nadler is asking, are you playing along with our completely biased and manipulated rules and specific privileges we give you, that you have to play along with that, and we ll lie, chea
the judiciary committee. listen if there are things like that the democrats are willing to commit to i think that would be progress. will we get the whistleblower as well? don t forget the anonymous person who was not on the phone call in question, who triggered entire investigation, also has a lawyer from beginning of 2017 is committed to a coup against the president. we need to be very clear, ed, if this is the way the democrats will go forward, i think that is conversation we ll have. up until then, it is not really a fair process. ed: in his letter to the president, friday, jerry nadler said something else missed by a lot of people. he said the judiciary committee has been engaged in investigation concerning allegations you president, may have engaged in acts of obstruction of justice as detailed in special counsel robert mueller s report on the investigation in 2016. hold on. are they also considering articles of impeachment dating back to the mueller report? i thought we already