point seven billion dollars for a border wall now analysts standard and poor s say the shutdown cost six billion dollars mostly due to lost productivity and weakened economic activity the council of economic advisors within the white house picks the cost even higher estimating a weekly loss of point one three percentage points of quarterly gross domestic product according to their numbers the month long dispute could cost the economy about twenty six billion dollars and it could all get even more expensive the current agreement will last for three weeks it is unclear what happens then. joining me now is our man on wall street yes carter welcome to the program. varying estimates there in terms of just how much the shutdown will end up costing the american economy how confident is the government that these costs will be recovered . yeah at this point it is rather difficult to really put
a lot of american workers in a really challenging financial situation and i think that in the future i hope that shut down. the family will be able to pay our bills will be able to take anything you know the off the street in and out begging for through. but the economic damage is done the shut down came over the white house s demand for five point seven billion dollars for a border wall now analysts to standard and poor s say the shutdown cost six billion dollars mostly due to lost productivity and weakened economic activity the council of economic advisors within the white house takes the costs even higher estimating a weekly loss of point one three percentage points of quarterly gross domestic product according to their numbers the month long dispute could cost the economy about twenty six billion dollars. and it could all get even more expensive the current agreement will last for three weeks it is unclear what happens then. the
generally had positive experiences to date. shares property bonds high risk whether he likes it or not. has to participate in the game of the big financial world it s an industry in party mood big company is a buying up competitors thanks to low interest rates and thereby increasing their share value only shareholders benefit from this strategy and they tend to be affluent. german chemical giant bya bort american seed supplier monsanto for example for sixty five billion year is. the world s largest brewery and why is a bush in bed swallowed the number two s a b. miller for the equivalent of over one hundred billion euros. and software giant microsoft board professional networking site linked in for twenty six billion
miller for the equivalent of over one hundred billion euros. and software giant microsoft board professional networking site linked in for twenty six billion company is as the playthings of international financial interests. the less prominent case w.m. s has been based in guys ling and in south west germany since the mid nineteenth century it s a brand with a world class reputation w m f manufactures cutlery and coffee makers it used to be in the hands of german owners and shareholders its operations meant security of the thousands of families then the financial gamblers set their sights on w.n. after. the company has changed owners three times in the past eleven has every time it sold the price goes up enormously at the
positive experiences to date. shares property bonds i risk whether he likes it or not. has to participate in the game of the big financial world it s an industry in party mood big company is a buying up competitors thanks to low interest rates and thereby increasing their share value only shareholders benefit from this strategy and they tend to be affluent. german chemical giant via board american seed supplier monsanto for example for sixty five billion year is. the world s largest brewery and why is a bush in bed swallowed the number two s a b. mila for the equivalent of over one hundred billion euros. and software giant microsoft board professional networking site linked in for twenty six billion