Actually justin trudeau is actually causing the accidents now. causing th study, you actually might wonder why it gets published at all. this is a conclusion from the paper. quote, the observed risks might also justify changes to driver insurance policies inr the future. so basically they re saying get the shot or pay higherrates. insurance rates. why not just put them in camps? i mean, that s clearly whatat i they d like to do. let s justs whaty t cut out the middleman. jason rantes, it really a stunning, stunning story. thank you for that. thanks, dr.. y ou so, of all the medical experts who were censored for asking questions aboutexpe the covid lockdown, maybe the most shockinrtg was a physician called dr. gao about a charra. he was one of the world s experts on these questions and he wasn t allowed to speak. he was recently restored to twitter, thankfully, he joins us next to tell us what he learned from the experience here at waiting.dition,
On fox. so everyone knew there is censorship on twitter. but until the files came out, the twitter files, we had no idea how extensive it was. turns out it was very extensivei during covid, especially in the people who are black listed who were prevented from speaking freely on twitter, weren t justfrom s people who we making up the science. it wasn t just people who were making cbd paste at their kitchen table. they should be able to speak to . it was exactly some of first the people you would talk to first when pandemic arrives, including dr. jabe , editor of stanford. but it was not i was punished univit was not i was punished the universal lockdowns werewn not the way to respond to covid ,but now he s back. he was disinvited twitter so headquarters by its new owner, elon musk,d. dr. about bettery a charge joins us tonight. doctor , thanks so much for coming on.hanks so much for of of all people, it was stunning to see you blacklisted. sue censored. what do you i must say to you,
Some old, very old media old, old owners of twitter. they wanted to create this illusion of consensus about the science. that s right. that s right. they they wanted to fool peope into thinking that we were following the science when, in fact, there was a robust debate among scientists about what the right thing to do was. and the consequence is schools closed, businesses closed,unvacn unvaccinated people lost their jobs. osbecause of mandates, even mandcause of mandates, even actually not none of the persuasive science actually supported any of those positions. peoplepported suffered as a a consequence of this censorship. and of course, it s an abstract violation of my civil rights, my first amendment rights. latin bu ot that s not the important ican the important thing is that people, american people were denied a debate, an honest debate. and i believe that had that honest debate taking place, none of those policies would have been put in place. and all of that suffering could have
Edlouisiana and the aclu, this new civil liberties alliance. what we found at government actors across a dozen federaln twtors across a dozen federaln with twitter, with social media telling these social agencies, c social media companies, whatrdii to censor in many cases, who to censor regarding information. it wasn. a it was a policy designed to make sure the american public did not hear that there were other alternative scientific views than just locked down lock down lockdown. what this does i mean, thisrett is pretty amazing on a lot of levels. l but the most basic is they told us that they wereng following the science and was our moral duty to do the same. t but you were practicing a science of all people to censor. you know that the stanford professor physician who specializes in this stuff seems like he d be the lastot person you d censor, correct? i mean, the key thing here, tucker, that i think folks need to know what they wanted to do . and this, i think, is government
When you went to visit him? well, i found out there that i was actually blacklisted the day i joined twitter. i joined in august 2020 one , we the public that we didn t need lockdown s we didn t need school lockd closures to manage the pandemic, that in fact man there were other ways to do ita. by protecting vulnerable people. i was puy t on apr trend blacklt the moment i joined in. no the audience knows what that means is that i write a tweet, my followers see the tweet, but on the trend blacklist, make sure thatllow people outside of my followerser don t see the tweet. it was it was something thatmet was designed to make sure that r my message didn t get out to the broader population. and what did i also found out wasat theq that it was at the request of unspecified agents. unclear who either inside or blacear who either inside or on this blacklist, which, by the way, is i m still on a trend blacklist even up until just a week ago. itis it s there s a there s e a case i ve been i