Page 18 - Two Plus News Today

Washington couldve been impeached based on these factless articles. there is no crime, there is no victim, as ukraine received their aid before september 30th deadline, and no witnesses that witnessed anything. this isnt about the law. its politics. and its worse. its disgraceful. its time to end this charade and scam on the american people. i urge everybody to vote no on these articles of impeachment. i yield back. >> gentleman from california. >> madam speaker, happy to remind my colleagues of...

That the russians are hacking into the democratic computers. so thats the -- thats the two plus two here. i think what the attorney general is saying is -- and by the way, horowitz says in his report. followed the rules. question, he says, are the rules right? is the predicate -- should there be something different when youre looking at a first amendment activity like a presidential campaign? thats a question he raises. but he says, nonetheless, lets apply the rules that existed at the time. the...

Its -- two plus two is not four, but two plus two equals ukraine. >> i want to read something you wrote about fox 234 your article. you said if you watch the impeachment hearings only on fox news you would have thought things were going great for the president. any phrase that sounded like it might have exonerated him, and there werent many, was repeated over and over like a mantra. the copious and damning evidence provided may as well not have existed. it is -- there is so much information now,...

Have a great thanksgiving. >> you too. >> senator richard blum blumenthal a democratic member of the snt judiciary committee. the president had been briefed on the whistle-blower complaint in august, that is before he unfroze the military aid to ukraine. so just that alone is this an example of two plus two equaling four again. >> its bigger than two plus two equaling four. this really terrific report i think shows why the president was in effect objecting to the potential charges about him befo...

In august, that is before he unfroze the military aid to ukraine. so just that alone is this an example of two plus two equaling four again. >> its bigger than two plus two equaling four. this really terrific report i think shows why the president was in effect objecting to the potential charges about him before the charges were made, that clip that you showed where he says no quid pro quo. and it was well before that phrase entered the public lexicon. but it also raises the very, very profoundl...

To sometimes wish for recordings and videos of crimes. theyre not all that common. what you have is circumstantial evidence. and the powerful witnesses that were on display last week, they had nothing to gain. and everything to lose. they were career civil servants who were risking everything and consistently described what the president said about these events and what his expectations were. and where you began in this conversation,s two plus two equals four. thats what you argue to a jury. and...

And everything to lose. they were career civil servants who were risking everything and consistently described what the president said about these events and what his expectations were. and where you began in this conversation,s two plus two equals four. thats what you argue to a jury. and ultimately the senate is the jury here. and the court of public opinion. >> senator richard blumenthal, thank you for being with us tonight. >> thank you. >> more perspectivy senior political analyst david ger...

Two plus two equals four. >> you believe you have some evidence that the ukrainians first inquired about security assistance to someone in your office on july 25 of this year is that right? >> thats correct. >> july 25 is also the day that president trump officially talked to president zelensky where investigations of the bideens were brought up is that right? >> i know what has been reported. >> that was reportrd is that right? >> thats correct. >> the july 25 call between zelensky and trump is...

The department of the defense spent weeks if not months determining the ukraine government meant every requirement in the law and made significant strides in combatting corruption. is that correct? >> we made that determination in may. >> you understood they received no credible explanation is that right? >> i couldnt give them one. >> this two plus two equals four kwgs y kw conclusion you reached? >> pretty much. >> the aide was a part of the quid pro quo? >> yep. >> president trump never told ...

Facts that could, at a minimum, embarrass the president. the white house counsels review of documents was triggered by the ongoing house impeachment inquiry. earlier today house intel chairman adam schiff talked about the importance of linking the presidents decision to freeze ukraine aid to his efforts to dig up dirt by the bidens. >> yes, the presidents chief of staff, the person who meets with the president every day on live camera admitted exactly that, veis-a-vis the most serious and that i...