Page 7 - U S Code News Today

And former presidents, vice president. i was just at a conference a week and a half ago with 11 representatives from those nations, all 11 nations, you hear commoninalities. there is problem and there are problems in those countries and america is absent. i dont know where he gets the idea were down there. those leaders have told me they dont hear from the biden administration. fact is, this is whats happening. it is deliberate policy and it is not about title 42. thats a stopgap. this is about ...

Thank you very much for joining us tonight, what is the law that clarence thomas is now apparently in violation of? >> the law, lawrence, is 28 u.s. code, section 4:55, and contains two provisions that almost any lawyer would say require clarence thomas not to participate at all. one of them says that a justice, specifically applies to supreme court justices, may not participate if somebody could reasonably question that justices impartiality. clearly, that is the case here. another section says...

They may lose their security, they may be disciplined. but typically, not prosecuted. here, we do have what appears to be a willful violation, because as we just said, donald trump has been battling with the archives for 18 months over this. so, hes been on notice of it. but i imagine part of the ongoing investigation that is referenced in the search warrant is to answer some of those questions, ali. why did he have this? have any copies been made and disseminated to anyone else but, who dont ha...

Contraband fruits of crime or other items illegally possessed in violation of 18 u.s. code section 793 2071 or 1519. that string of numbers i just read is actually a set of federal statutes. 793 for instance is part of what is known as the ex pianist act. it deals with the quote gathering transmitting or losing defense information. this specific session of the espionage act that federal authorities cited the search warrant concerns collecting transferring or losing information relating to nation...

Potentially classified materials and evidence of crimes. today we learned exactly which laws the justice department had reason to believe may have been violated. what specific items they were searching for and what they took from the immediate past presidents home. heres a second detachment to the warrant. it is titled quote, attachment b. property to be ceased -- all physical documents and records constituting evidence contraband fruits of crime or other items illegally possessed in violation o...

And ty cobb, he was the lawyer in the investigation. two who know more about this than anyone. professor, let me start with you on this reporting about messages wiped from key department of defense officials phones from january 6th. is it possible that this is a random coincidence? >> no. i mean, i suppose anything is possible. its possible that all of the air will get sucked out of the room, but when you look at what happened with the secret service and with the department of homeland security ...

I wont go into the details. its called the neutrality act. it was written in 1794 by george washington, preventing people from going to france to fight for the french. it was updated in the late 1800s and 1930s. it basically says its a u.s. code provision that says the u.s. government, not individual americans, decide foreign policy. so when you have individuals going to fight for another country, putting themselves in harms way, whereas it may seem extremely admirable, if theyre taken prisoners...

Violated to federal criminal statutes. that is liz cheney saying that. -- federal judge. rolling president trump and his -- john eastman, likely violated to federal laws. when they pressured mike pence the way that they did. and what she specifically describing, you could check in on the judges ruling, are these two federal statutes. 18 u.s. coats, section 15 12 c, at 18 u.s. code section 371. in plain english that is obstruction of a official proceeding, and its conspiracy to defraud the. unite...

Rulling president trump and his -- john eastman, likely violated to federal laws. when they pressured mike pence the way that they did. and what she specifically describing, you could check in on the judges ruling, are these two federal statutes. 18 u.s. coats, section 15 12 c, at 18 u.s. code section 371. in plain english that is obstruction of a official proceeding, and its conspiracy to defraud the. united states, and you know, theres been all this talk in the last, i hate people in the media...

Was getting at in this little part of her intro there, in this specific part of it. >> president trumps relentless effort on january 6th and in the days beforehand to pressure vice president pence to refuse to count lawful, electoral votes. as a federal judge has indicated, this likely violated two federal criminal statutes. >> trumps effort on january 6th to pressure vice president pence he should refuse to count the votes likely violated two statutes. per a ruling, likely violated two federal ...