statement that five additional pages of documentsad with classified markingsdition e found at biden s home thursday evening. now, surely this new hs was to those democrats who have spent the past seven years squawkingre about the rule of law and normsa whght? wrong. t what is the proper thing for a former president to do if he i finds that there are government documents or classifiedovernmen documents that are in hisession possession? and my understanding is they did the right thing. my de a different procedure for dealing with them that we are unaware of. uand that s a meaningful thingo that we could look at. bu.t obviously, we don t wantca to turn this into just a political football. i know exactlotball.y what president biden said when he was informed that these documents were found in his office, in his office in washington. and that was a oh, followed washin, by a four letter explet. and it s an embarrassment, no doubt, about it. e to i there more to it? i doubt it. y
with the doj. do any oe f those defenses doj. actually work in a potential crime? well, the the inadvertent defense is crumpled fairly quickly after it was first raisedkly af. it s hard to make an i inadvertent sense when you have documents that presumably were taken around 20 or 17 when he o left office as vice president and then appeared to be divided and distributed to differentd then spots. the question is , why would you have that division unless these documents were being used ford o some purpose? now, that purpose could be one t of a number of things, but the most obvious would be the use on it to be used on the book that the vice then vice president was working on , which included subjects like w ukraine.e don but, you know, we don t know. that. bu t there s other questions recen raised by the most recent disclosures. you the the last statement wastt