unaccountability through a displaced idea that there are safety in numbers. there are cameras everywhere and everybody eventually hopefully will be brought to justice. >> show me your friends and i will show you your future. thank you both. meantime it is 8:20 on the west coast. west coast. hurricane it dahlia strengthening into a category 3. it might already be a category 3. we just haven't heard from the national hurricane center. we are live on the ground in tampa next. later in the nightcap, if you had a big red button and could program it to do one thing every time you pressed it, what would that be? let us know on social media. tell us what your red button is and we will tell you what the rest of the country wants to hear about your red button coming up.
was like, you know, i just can't do this anymore. i think it was a big turning point for me, physically. mentally, i'm still working on it. but physically, it was just -- it was a point where i was like, i have to change. >> reporter: what followed were daily family meals where at first candace monitored her daughter's plates. and it was at one of those dinners where candace mentioned an ad she had seen for a law firm that was helping families sue the social media companies. >> the social media victims law centers has received attention for its efforts to hold companies accountable for causing these harms. >> reporter: she was stunned that there were families blaming social media for things like eating disorders instead of themselves. >> i'm thinking, here we go again with this unaccountability that seems to be taking over the whole country. >> reporter: you're the parent who would say this is bs.
for its efforts to hold companies accountable for causing these harms. >> reporter: she was stunned that there were families blaming social media for things like eating disorders instead of themselves. >> i'm looking at it thinking, wow, here we go again with this unaccountability that seems to be taking over the whole country. >> reporter: you're the parent who would say this is bs. >> right. i get that parent 100%. here in cincinnati, conservative, christian, that's the mentality, it's my fault, of course. >> reporter: but that night at the kitchen table, she heard a different take from her daughter. >> i said, can you believe this? these people are trying to sue the forum and is saying it's their fault. i'm like, isn't that ridiculous? she said, it's not ridiculous. so you think it's good that they're going to come after these companies and she said absolutely, i think it's about damn time.
said. >> what i meant with that, was it's a ton more to unravel basic rights and decisions than any court in recent history, and that's what i meant by not normal. it's just so out of sorts with the basic value system of the american people. and i think that across the board, the vast majority of the american people don't agree with a lot of the decisions these courts are making. >> steve, you're a professor of law at the university of texas sk and an expert on the u.s. supreme court. is he right? is this not a normal court? >> there's a colonel of truth to what the president is saying. i think certainly some of the court's decisions really are inconsistent with public opinion. to me, where the current court really starts to look very different from its predecessors, wolf, is less in the substance of individual decisions like the affirmative action ruling today, and more in just the general climate of unaccountability, the notion that the court is not and
where we have a culture of unaccountability and in a culture of there's no responsibility, we have people prosecuting crimes that won't prosecute if crimes, and we had the defund the police. all these things are coming together and creating a problem in this country that's now manifest itself in shooting like this. pete: yeah, no, you're right. i'd like to stay with the border, and it remains to be seen the motives and background of the shooter, but we'll see. you mentioned the border, congressman. title 42 the is expiring on thursday, and we're already seeing a flood of illegals. we're sending -- the biden administration is sending 1500 troops to the border, something they said was horrible when it was done under the trump administration. here's joe biden defending that move. take a listen. >> we're in a situation now where those 1500 people at the border, they're not there to enforce the law, they're there to free up the border agents that need on the on the border, and we're having another 1,000 people coming in, they're a asylum judges to make judgments
george floyd justice and policing act which was stalled by and large by the efforts of police unions. and so it is not a question of how, it is a question of will. and so, you know, that's part of it. the other thing is that to mark's point, one thing that is important about these departments is that they're not only -- they tend not to be accountable externally, but when you look at problems that the departments are problematic in this way, they also tend to be unaccountable internally. meaning that the internal affairs doesn't deal with complaints that police officers themselves have about the way that a department may be functioning or the way that a particular precinct may be functioning. and it is that duality that, that unaccountability on both ends that ends up augmenting or catalyzing the situations that we just saw happen in memphis. >> "the washington post" editorial board does call for bipartisan reform including banning chokeholds, limiting no knock warrants, creating a
>> bill: republicans detailing allegations of misconduct at the f.b.i. and d.o.j. what's this about? anita vogel has the story in washington. good morning. >> good morning to you, bill. just days before the all-important mid-terms house republicans are reupping their concerns with a compilation of their complaints over the last two years. just giving voters one more thing to think about before tuesday. the report is 1,000 pages with the first 67 laying out the complaints. it is pretty daming declaring the f.b.i. under wray and garland is broken. unnamed whistleblowers tell members of congress the blame lies what they describe as the f.b.i.'s politicized bureaucracy and suggest f.b.i.'s washington hierarchy is, quote, rotted at its core with a systemic culture of unaccountability and full of corruption, manipulation and
would do. i avoided smoking with guys named blake. wyndham's names like that because they have really long stories and horrible agendas that never go anywhere much lik this lawsuit. >> what would you rather have a drug that's too powerful or a drug not powerful enough. >> i would like one that is at the power and paranoid i'm curious where is the shame? is like trying to get your mone back from a hooker. >> i wouldn't know. but it wasn't that great after all now that i think about it. i getting need some money back for that one young lady in you to use or yeah i've been there. it's a dirty show after all. are we still on the air? i don't know peter you're big unaccountability, is there a
going. ly. we've hdone everything they've asked of him to do in this country, but now the tables seem to be turned and they seem more upset about the backstabbing and unaccountability that's going on. nobody wants to take responsibility or blame for how this is playing out. this will be very interesting in the next few hours. i want to read one more thing for you, jim, because i got it on my phone and it's from a brief that the federal government put up on their site. it says, and i'm quoting, there is no such thing as an assurance of entry by a non-citizen into australia. reflects the to determine who is
simple for everybody. i am with tyrus on had it point: i want someone held accountable. if no one is, you can get away with anything in this country. there's been so much that has gone wrong and laws broken and no one gets held accountable. the rest of us go, we feel helpless. it's insane. >> greg: the reason for the unaccountability you need an objective media. they only hold a certain side accountable. yesterday they said we will do a nothing to see here assumption and get the "new york times" to do this rebuttal and everybody will point to that.