The Obama Administration and the Prime Minister. Today, whether the Budget Committee can come together, we will have more details. Before they gavel in we want you to weigh in on this debate in washington. In the face of National Security threats from isis and others around the globe, should the pentagon budget be increased . The numbers are on the screen. You can also send us a tweet you can go to facebook, and also send us an email. The phone lines are open. Before we get to your thoughts, molly otoole from defense one joins us to talk about this. Gop hawks want to use defense for funds to skirt this. What does each chamber want to do and what has the president opposed . Proposed . Guest the house and senate have very different approaches. The house released their proposal on tuesday. These are nonbinding medical agreement, but any russian of but are an expression of priority. The house proposed 523 billion for defense, which adheres to the level set in fiscal year 2015 and the budge
Opportunity for bad actors to play games with the process and applies new technological updates to the process as well. The republicans time and time again seem to want to waste time on grandstanding instead of legislating. This is a perfect example of another bill that wont become law. The republicans want to tilt the economy towards the wealthy, towards big business, towards c. E. O. s. We were sent here to do the peoples work. The new rule for the nlrb is entirely consistent with the legislative intent of the creation of that agency and its for the advantage of people who live in our towns and cities. It improves the economy, raises up the middle class, helps give everybody a fair shot at the American Dream. When we talk about the pathway to the American Dream the pathway to success in our country, the organized Labor Movement has and continues to make enormous contributions towards making sure that americans are learning earning livable wages, that they can support their families a
The gentleman from virginia reserves and has 14 1 2 minutes remaining. The gentleman from minnesota is recognized and has 17 minutes remaining. Mr. Kline thank you, mr. Speaker. Id like to yield three minutes to another new member of the committee weve got an almost embarrassment of riches of hardworking new members the gentleman from my neighboring state, wisconsin, mr. Growthman, three minutes. Mr. Grothman glad to speak one more time on s. J. Resolution 8. Im make two points. Again. One of the things we see here is we have new rules which continue a trend and that is youre fundamentally changing the way things have been for 70 years. Ok. In the past, unions have done a good job organizing. We have added Union Representation to things. But one of the things that business wants and america wants is consistency. One more time no big problems for 70 years, we are turning things fundamentally around. Why is that bad . The gentleman from oregon just said this is no big deal because busine
Here is the gallup hold that breaks down americans level of worrying about environmental problems. The top of the list is the pollution of Drinking Water. Americans were worried about this a great deal in 2014, versus those in 2015. 47 of americans were worried about pollution of lakes, rivers, and reservoirs in 2014,5, lower than in 2014. And only 32 say they are worried about Global Warming or Climate Change. Even as Global Warming has received greater attention from politicians and the media americans worry about it is no higher now than when gallup first asked about it in 1989. Part of the excavation for this may be because the results are quite different when you break down the survey responses by political party. The gallup poll shows that democrats are much more worried about Environmental Issues and republicans are. 13 of republicans in 2014 2015 said they were worried about Climate Change, which is significantly lower than 2014. For democrats, more than half of them said they
Would not include language from the same executive order directing agencies to perform these assessments to the extent feasible. Section 10 would require agencies to provide impacted parties in the private sector but not other stakeholders with an advanced opportunity to provide input on proposed regulations. It would require agencies to conduct consultations with private sector businesses as early as possible before the issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking, expanding this consultation requirement only to the private sector could allow businesses to have an advantage over other stakeholders, as i mentioned previously, such as taxpayers and environmental groups with reference to the development of regulatory proposals. During consideration of this bill by the committee, one of the members offered an amendment that stated any opportunities or rights afforded to a corporation under this section shall also be afforded to any interested individuals. He amendment was rejected. My good