The Supreme Court has dismissed a petition seeking review of its judgment in Ram Kishore Arora v. Directorate of Enforcement which held that the ED need not supply to the accused the grounds of arrest.
The Supreme Court on Friday (December 15) held that its judgment in Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India which held that the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) must furnish the grounds of arrest to the.
Section 153A IPC -.
Share This -
Question of intent would be relevant for offences under Section 153A, 295A IPC.
The Supreme Court interpreted the ingredients of the offence under Section 153A of the Indian Penal Code in the case Amish Devgan v Union of India.Interpreting Section 153A(b) of the Indian Penal Code, the Supreme Court has held that the term public tranquility must be read in a restricted sense synonymous with public order and safety and not normal law and order issues that do not endanger.
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.