Survey map not produced the new deadline was not met more the materials material see if the project sponsor was going to get a wave if the was to be granting it not retrofits the real issues the neighborhood 80 want to address is not addressed in in any way, shape, or form doesnt this comply with the policies for remove a loss of Housing Stock by morgue as outlined in my briefs on pages 11 and telephone it is changed in the past two years if you look at exhibit 6 thats the old application that was submitted by this project sponsor more than too years ago the new application was submitted by another neighbor as exhibit c to timothy and the policies have completely changed since april 2013, the mayor has issued executive orders and please remember there was a rent control tenant living in the lower unit at the time of the fire and rent control tenants occupied this building continuously there was a vufbt of a mandatory discretionary review but thats not true plans was contemplating the m
The neighborhood that we love, including the nature of the open space and the backyards, the playground across the street. Its a great place, its a great neighborhood to raise children, and were very pleased that kevin and karen are moving in with their two children. I think its great the families are moving in. Our basic unresolved issue with the remodel is the impact it has on our space, air and light and privacy. [speaker not understood] or remodel, we believe the remodel will greatly impact our space, air and light and privacy, especially the Southern Exposure of our house. We are most concerned about the lack of a setback on the main floor. The main floor living space will come right up to our Property Line versus the separation that exists today. The rear part of our house is setback 7 feet from that Property Line and i believe the existing design which i think is from 1911 is setback similar amount of feet, maybe a little more. We are asking that the design take the impact to us
Its different equally. And a tenant would be tenants on the lease this is or sub tenants as well . The legislation didnt specify. Do you know what the intent of the author. I think the idea is to help everyone thats impacted by the displacement well make that issue. We know that the tenant hardest hit are the long term tenants so if i have a tenant with multiple tenants and one has been there for thirty years and maybe a newer or sub tenant i dont know if theres any other way to do that but ive wondering to taking into consideration if its dont believe. Were open to suggestions. So thank you. So supervisor may i like to ask the budget analyst mr. Fred to come and do a brief presentation the question was to provide information that analyze the profits that are being gained from some of the evictions typical the ellis act eviction that provides context for us to understand the financial benefits that some of the landlords have in doing evictions to provide some context for what is fair i
In relation to the midblock open area. The rdt noted the following. That light and air access and the building scale in relation to the midblock open area are addressed by the projects rear addition stepping down toward the rear yard. The rear addition would not extend to an exceptional depth when compared to the depths of both adjacent buildings. With regard to privacy the project is considered to be within the privacy tolerances to be expected when living in a dense urban environment such as San Francisco and within the Zoning District which allows full lot width development and requires no side yards. With regard to neighborhood character and context, the addition would not be visible from the public rightofway. However, the project proposes durable high quality residential scale materials such as painted woodsiding and metal wood windows for both vertical and horizontal elements of the project. In conclusion, the Department Finds the project to be consistent with the residential De
Vacation then the rent will be lower and so you never refer back to the base rent. No when we talked about the evidence it will not be there. Another way of doing that would be to take the original base rent and increase it on the one hand for the market rate increases over time and on the other hand, for what the allowable rent increases and to compare the two. Yes. That will be an alternative and was it considered. Yeah, but we rely on the basis rent and if its 27 years ago that might not be realistic. In terms of the factor the 3. 0 is that compounding the matthew increase rates in San Francisco for each calendar year. Yes and were relying on the published data. Supervisor campos. I want to note we discussed both alternatives with the Apartment Associations and to have something that creates clarity i wont speak for them but the formula that is sort of being the preferred one is something thats my understanding they prefer as well but they can speak for themselves. I have nothing fu