At trial on each of the counts as knowledge, mr. show intent and what the government alleges in the indictmen is t is that that donald trump knew that all of these things he was saying were completelydo false, that somehow donald trump knew that all of these elections wereew that coy perfect and they were clean, they were the best elections ever, and they even cited all kinds of different reports. they arose after the electionth to say, oh, he clearly had knowledge that everythine elec g in this election was great. but the problem is, is that donaldthing trump apparently had a lot of questions about the election, like a lot ofdo people did. and so saying that you knew that the results were falsld e is not exactly the same as saying that that you can t haveesults wtly the questions. and so what s going to happen at trial is the government is going to have. oing hap to carry its burden to prove a bunch of these different counts. prnch of d of theseknowle different counts, including knowl
Quite frankly, i don t think we ve ever had an election in the united states history that we ve comons e out of having more questions than we did post 2020. obviouslited y, one of those people as well was the sitting president of the united states, my father in law, donald trump,m who did exactly what you wouldo want a president to do. he upheld and defendedle as wene the constitution of the united states by trying to ensure that d had a free and fair election. that was his whole goal. that s what he wanted to ensure was going on. and i think, as your previous guest pointed out, what about his first amendment freedoious gueat aboutm of spee? what about what he actuallywhata said on january 6th atbosa the ellipse that he wanted people to peacefullyid o and patriotically make their voices heard? a what about his tweet later that afternoon? i am asking everyone at the u.s. capitol to remain peaceful, no violence. remember, , we are the party of law and order. d
The election was fraudulent when he really knew the election was clean and that these lies made it hard for the government to certify the election. now, first, they saidthese trump called a bunch of state , gislators in georgia arizona, pennsylvania, michigan and wisconsin and tried to get them to investigate electionnnsy fraud. hold hearings. okaylvania, michnd . then the government says trump tried to get some states to send in trump electorset som instead of biden electors, and onlyo send i a tiny handfuli states did that. they mailed in some trump electors to the archivist and to the senate, and then the senate threw them in the garbage and ratified the biden electors. gae, and rthat was it. then they re saying trump broke the law when he asked pence to do the right thing to not certify asked mpenk it back to the states. that was a different legal interpretation than many people had at the time, but it was a difference of opinion and it didn t matter because pence didn t do i
And the sad thing about itr deal is there s never l been a lie before congress where we actually could prove that someone lieden a lie by their on words. usually someone else came in or some other evidence. we have anthony, anthony fauci, in his own words, admitting thatmeone elnd there he lied. and yet, merrick garland, the most partisan in the historyl of the united states, is not doing anything about it. and garland s prosecutors are bloodthirsty for donald trump. he was just indicted today on january 6th. how do you stomach that? how d you know, i don t knowo how yoy can someone for claiming there was fraud in the election. manyhat m on the say, oh, we, there is no fraud because the court said srto. well, most of the courts didn t say this. most of the court said they wouldn t hear the election question and they wouldn t hear whether or not the state legislaturso they e, pennsylvan, could change the date of the election or whether the unelecteature in ldd election body in wis
Two and a half years. he s going to have subpoena power. and hals.he s going to cross-ee witnesses. he s going to put on his own witnesse subps. he s going to go out and prove or try to prove there wasnd election fraud in philly, vegas. ,arizona, detroit and the federal government is goings cla to have to prove that it was clean in those deep blue countien s. to that s going to be a fun one to follow. so trump s due in court on thursday for the january six charges. trump ise you re keeping cas score at home, donald trump will be one yoscore tria different courtrooms next year, an election year while he s running for president, while he s fundraising, and while he s debated. so he ll be in court on bookkeeping charges manha with stormy daniels in manhattan in march. he ll be in a florida courtroom beginning in may on the mar-a-lago documents case, and he l oom begiay l be in a d.c.troom on courtroom on the january six charges, probably in the spring as well.