Page 4 - Upper Terrace News Today

Just wanted to say with this here, i know if you can underline on july 5th, irving zaretzky keeps saying he had no idea about the height. I saw this letter or may 3, 2013. He saw this on july 5, 2012. It clearly states 3 points of our house unbeknownst to us that he measured and he filed the date after he found out that our height was not correct. One thing i want to say is i have reached out and tried to talk to neighbors. I feel that irving doesnt even live on the block and he has somehow been...

Zoning administrator. For you . It was security and privacy. Now its more of a apln eakg on the behalf of 25 people. That it should be on the 7minute component and 3minute rebuttal. If the people that are here speaking for the appellant would state they are part of that briefing creation and they do not get additional time from Public Statement standpoint. Would that be correct . If thats correct, they are not officially aligned with the appellant. He mentioned in his brief that it was complying...

Intended. Okay. Thank you. Mr. Sanchez . I have one question. The appellant is speaking on behalf of 25 people. That it should be on the 7minute component and 3minute rebuttal. If the people that are here speaking for the appellant would state they are part of that briefing creation and they do not get additional time from Public Statement standpoint. Would that be correct . If thats correct, they are not officially aligned with the appellant. He mentioned in his brief that it was complying with...

Many ways to notch or accommodate the ada there are opportunities that were and are possible but i cant vote for this testimony i agree im going to vote against it it didnt really respond to the disconnection at least i thought we were going to get back the interior of the building overall youre getting this bonus of adding this enormous building in the front but at the same time taking a look at the neighbors this didnt do its a vote 3 for the dr for a foot down 4 against it 3 of which have cla...

Its something that the commission struggled with there should be changes to the project deferring opinions that was continued for several hearings for the sponsor to work with the department some changes were proposed and ultimately at the place Planning Commission hamburger no concession on the direction to move forward and because of that any failure will result in the project no discretionary review was taken and the project move forward thats the brief summary of the project as i say to the ...

Made any exterior changes that were not on those plans that the permit said was approved may 23, 2013. Which we were allowed, the board of appeals was a start but we were allowed in that finding to make changes providing that irving zaretzky was okay with. He didnt care about interior changes and the Planning Department was okay. They did. I think Scott Sanchez looked at our approved plans and building looked at them and walked around our building and found 100 percent we did not exceed in any s...

To say. Is there any additional Public Comment . Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Mr. Woois, we have rebuttal time. Three minutes. 3 minutes. Things have changed. The first thing i would like to mention is i have been as Everybody Knows more or less the driving force. Im not shamed of that. In fact it is important to note that no place at any time have i made an issue of the view. My issue has entirely been from the very first both at the hearing on august 28th in my statement of oppositio...

Okay. I cant answer your question. Sure. I just asked. Got it. Thank you. Not right now. Thank you. Scott sanchez, planning department. I believe the project sponsor has compelling arguments, in our decision letter. I would like to go back to the subject property 272 Upper Terrace in our zoning district. At this rear property we have Mount Olympus and there is a public sidewalk at the rear Property Line essentially of the subject property. In june 2013, they did seek a Building Permit to build a...

Units. What mr. Sanchez putting this forward is why we are making changes to the house. They are the owners and the project sponsors desire to make changes if they are not conforming with the approved plans, that is board approved. My question is my understanding is not that those plans were frozen and there was a condition of no changes. Again, historically, those plans were initiated with my prior client, the older woman who just wanted a minimal amount of work. The new owner who came at the t...

There. So im sure that the City Government is aware of the fact that slowly but surely, we in San Francisco are having our views obscured and this to me by granting this variance, it simply continuing that trend of slowly but surely taking away beautiful space from both us who live there and all the tourist who come there. Im really hoping that the board will not permit this variance to go through. Thanks for letting me event. Hi there. I live on terrace. There are some separate issues we have. ...