Page 2 - Uranium Assets News Today

Uranium assets. you cant talk about the 2016 election without talking about the clinton foundation and now were learning more and more that you cant talk about the clinton foundation without looking at the uranium one deal. because bob mueller was the head of the fbi in 2009 when these allegations, accusations, information was coming forward, i think that either by negligence or by malfeasance this information didnt come forward to the congress. its also noteworthy that rod rosenstein was a u.s....

>> well, the question is whether or not bob mueller can investigate russias investigation to the 6016 election if he has a conflict of interest as to either of the participant in that election. in 2009 we knew that russia was trying to infiltrate our uranium assets. >> im asking you a question, what is the standard of conflict of interest under law? what is the conflict of interest standard youre referencing? >> oh, look. if you have a relationship to a party, or if your own conduct was part of ...

Rosenstein was the u.s. attorney that silenced -- >> ive heard about uranium and im sure well get there. moving in order, well put up the conflicts. prosecutors must recuse if they have a personal or political relationship with people that are involved in the subject investigation or they have a substantial interest. so it sounds like youre referring to conflict rule one. who are the people? >> it is the matter -- >> let me ask the question. who are the people -- >> hillary clinton is the person...

that russians were trying to undermine our uranium assets through bribery, kickbacks and exextortion. at that very same time you have the state department not speaking up against transaction while the clinton foundation was filling out deposit slips from russian oligarchs. that appearance of conflict of interest is enough to have mueller recuse himself. >> you havent mentioned bob mueller. you just said things you believe bad about hillary clinton. what is the conflict -- as you know, youre a...

Clinton and the scale of the mining company in the u.s. what exactly are you looking for, sir, here? and what have you learned? >> well, i would maybe disagree with your characterization. i dont think you meant it as that, but this isnt an investigation into hillary clinton. this is really quite different than that. its an investigation into the justice department. and into the fbi. i mean, at a time when we had a russian company through a canadian intermediary who was seeking to purchase 20% of...

The united states dialoguing, questions and answers with senators from across the country. lots of issues being discussed. the economy, jobs, a strong and healthy economy, trade, energy, regulatory relief that has meant so much to help jobs and the economy across the country, as well as neil gorsuch on the supreme court and additional opportunities that we have to put more judges in place over the next months and years. >> dana: while i have you, one more question on something we led the show wi...

Here and loretta lynch and the investigation. >> yes. especially this week whether you have news of the russians corrupting the process to award that uranium contract or uranium -- well, scam, really, that gave them 20% of our uranium assets here in the united states practically speaking. you had the justice department under loretta lynch, james comey and robert mueller investigating this and we dont know anything about that? wheres the investigation of the connections to the clinton campaign an...

Russians. remember the russians were pumping millions of dollars into john podestas brothers lobbying firm through the whole process. the clintons were related through their foundations $100 million gift to the guy that owns the company that was the beneficiary of selling 20% of our uranium assets to the russians putting them in their control. so the relationship with the russians is really quite deep in the clinton campaign and i think a lot of the reasons you are seeing the liberals and democr...

He proudly displayed on his office wall. they then acknowledged yes, the meeting had taken place. >> what happened to his company that benefited from the deal in kazakhstan? >> after a merger it became a uranium giant called uranium one. then the russians bought it. >> uranium one became very active in acquiring uranium assets in the united states itself. why 2009 they were an attractive target for the russian government. >> the russians acquired that target. >> they had uranium output by 2015. ...

Heres what i found so far with the donations and certain actions. can you connect the dots? thats where she is still not fully exposed yet because it has not been proven that some law was broken. >> were talking about tens of millions of dollars with people associated with this uranium deal. the russians own 51% of a company that has 20% of uranium assets in the united states. lets fast forward to 2009 and 2013. >> thats where it went through the administration. what officials tell us is there a...