there s more coming. feels like this is just the beginning of the first trickle of may be the flow of information. greg: the incidental collection, that is not the story. it s what happened afterwards with the information. here s a simple analogy pray let s say you are in line at confession and your neighbor is confessing and you hear bits and pieces. an act with a gardener may be. it s not your fault you overheard it. it is incidental collection of information. if you broadcast it to your mother s bridge club later, that is the sin. that s what we are talking about here. it s not about the collection. that happens to everybody. it is the dissemination afterwards. i think that s what you have to focus on, right? dana: more information means both of these stories are going to be fueled and the underlying questions about collusion and you ve got the alleged collusion with manafort and former people close to trump
probably the most liberal county. not surprising that they downplayed it. very little local coverage, i might add. should have gotten coverage bridge should be covered by the mainstream media, as you call it. it should be covered by a lot of people because rape is rape, whether it s done by people who are citizens of this country or not. it s a plague on our country and it should be reported. kimberly: i had, new york city s far left mayor has just ordered schools to block immigration enforcement officias from entering. bill de blasio s very bad decision next. my insurance rates are probably gonna double. but dad, you ve got. .allstate. with accident forgiveness they guarantee your rates won t go up just because of an accident. smart kid. indeed. it s good to be in, good hands.
journalism to lump sean penn in with them. you and gayle have both talked about this robin hood-like figure, it s such a glamorization, but still looking at heinous charges, murder and tons of other capital offenses. i don t like that glamorization. rolling stone coming off the virginia/uva rape case, they have a credibility issue they re still trying to rebuild. i doint think this does them any favors. he was proven guilty. he was in prison. and i criticize this if it s done with a politician, but giving this criminal essentially veto power of the article. rolling stone said he doesn t exercise it, but it was submitted to him in advantage. rolling stone should have never agreed to that. they already have a credibility issue. they have lawsuits against them because of the uva story. so they shouldn t be denigrating their journalistic responsibility any further. if you read the article, sean penn uses it as a platform for
about this robin hood-like figure, it s such a glamourization, but still looking at heinous charges, murder and tons of other capital charges. in fact, frankly rolling stone coming out of the virginia/uva rape case, they have a credibility issue they re trying to rebuild. i don t think this does them any favors. he was found guilty. yeah. and i criticize this if it s done with a politician, but given this criminal veto power of the article? rolling stone said he doesn t exercise it, but it was submitted to him in advantage. rolling stone should have never agreed to that. they already have a credibility issue because of the uva story, so they shouldn t be denigrating their journalistic responsibility any further. if you read the article, sean penn uses it as a platform for
a whole. senior political analyst is here with thoughts about all of this. hi. rolling stone rolling stone s magazine overdue apology brings to three the number of recently exposed whoppers that made their way into the national blood stream. first the claim that a white cop in ferguson, missouri shot dead a black man as he stood before him with his hands up. harry reid didn t try to defend his lie that mitt romney paid no income taxes and the recklessness on the uva story. three stories on topics with one thread. they all fit nicely into favored political narratives of the american left, the claim of epidemic of sexual assaults on college campuses. the idea of mitt romney and other business men as fact cats who risk themselves at the expense of others and the notion