we disputed the dna evidence at the very beginning that was used to convict her. what did they get wrong about the dna evidence? well, what they did was, they went way below where we look, so there s a level at which we set our instruments for sensitivity. and you don t want to go below that, because there s chemicals or small bits of transfer that can occur. that s one of the reasons. if you want to go that far down, you have to demonstrate through a validation process that you can. so the normal level for those instruments was at a level called 200 relative fluorescent units. they took them down far below that. the fbi wouldn t even look at anything below 200 at that time to incriminate anybody. my lab would maybe go to 150. there was no dna at that level. so we disputed it. the appellate court wisely said we re not going to hear from defense experts or prosecution experts and the judge appointed two experts out of rome, they
the very beginning that was used to convict her. what did they get wrong about the dna evidence? well, what they did was, they went way below where we look, so there s a level at which we set our instruments for sensitivity. and you don t want to go below that, because there s chemicals or small bits of transfer that can occur. that s one of the reasons. if you want to go that far down, you have to demonstrate through a validation process that you can. so the normal level for those instruments was at a level called 200 relative fluorescent units. they took them down far below that. the fbi wouldn t even look at anything below 200 at that time to incriminate anybody. my lab would maybe go to 150. there was no dna at that level. so we disputed it. the appellate court wisely said we re not going to hear from defense experts or prosecution
no, there is never any doubt about this case. we disputed the dna evidence at the very beginning that was used to convict her. what did they get wrong about the dna evidence? well, what they did was, they went way below where we look, so there s a level at which we set our instruments for sensitivity. and you don t want to go below that, because there s chemicals or small bits of transfer that can occur. that s one of the reasons. if you want to go that far down, you have to demonstrate through a validation process that you can. so the normal level for those instruments was at a level called 200 relative. they took them down far below that. the fbi wouldn t even look at anything below 200 at that time to incriminate anybody. my lab would maybe go to 150. there was no dna at that level.
the prison designed to be free of gang politics. even though they have sensitive needs, they re still predators, still thugs, still gangsters and they don t want to give that life up. what they do, they go out in these sensitive needs yard and seize opportunity. you know, he s going to prey on the weak. they call themselves the 2-5s. in spanish, a quarter is, their pcs they say in spanish. from there they took it on to 2-5. they re active on our facility and other snys throughout the state here. we ve placed several of them in administrative segregation, and we re in the process now of validating some of these inmates as being members of the disruptive group. we ve discovered various tattoos and symbols that are used by the 2-5. the validation process requires three separate pieces of evidence ranging from artwork to tattoos.
let s go. we re going to have a chitchat. they bring him in for a interview about his possible gang affiliation as part of the validation process. we did shakedowns in your unit today. that s why you were out in rec yard for awhile. during the search we found this book here with gang writing symbolism on it. we want to ask you about it. what about it? what information is on it? what do you have written? what does it say? i m asking you. come on, man. you re going to do what you re going to do. you know what i mean? it says what it says. that s what it is. some numbers, some letters, some initials. you know, if you think they are gang, then take the necessary let me explain to you explain to me what the meanings are to you. why? they are for me, not you. or anyone else. they are for me. in the back pages of your