Considered in closed session. Any Public Comment . I dont see any Public Comment is closed. Item 2 consider adoption of a motion on whether or not to assert the attorney clooib client privilege with legal council. So commissioners youll need to make a motion to conduct into closed session. Commissioner moore. Move to assert attorneyclient privilege. Second. Thank you on that motion po to assert and move into commission. Commissioner antonini commissioner moore commissioner wu commissioner Vice President richards and commissioner president fong so moved, commissioners, that motion passes unanimously 5 to zero and if give me a moment ill lock the doors well start convening in open session for item 4 following the closed session the Planning Commission in open session will report on any action during the closed session and consider a motion regarding whether to disclose no action taken during that closed session so i dont know if you want to report think outside the box 0 officially. Comm
Guest it would be information on threats and risks, basically on threat signatures, potential attackers that would help a company if it chose to do so defend itself better. Its not going to be privacy data. Well, thats the hope. Probably not. But its a good first step, and i think if you talk to some of the sponsors, they would tell you, you know, we know its just a first step, we know we have to do more, but we can get agreement on this, and it builds consensus on the hill to bring forward on cybersecurity. Host well, lets bring in tim starks of politico who covers cybersecurity for that organization to. Hi, jim. You mentioned there was the real deal waiting in congress. What would that look like . What are Things Congress hasnt done it should be doing once they finish this bill, even if they dont finish this bill . Guest they have to think about dhs, its authorities, what are its roles. Dhs has this grand mission to defend the nations cyberspace, but they have neither authorities or
Over that 50 billion threshold and would save us some supervisory resources, this isnt a musthave. On living wills, the very largest banks in the country are even larger today than they were during the financial crisis, the living wills provision of dodd frank was to make sure the banks never threaten the economy again by giving regulators addition additional and only the fdic took the official position that the wills were not credible. The feds decision not to join the fdic has slowed both regulators ability to take additional action. Why would the fed voluntary give up additional authorities to force changes at problem banks . So, we took the position that this was a completely new process, and we stated this when we put out guidance on the living will process that we expected to have to work with firms for a few rounds in order to understand what we needed to see in a plan and to give firms reasonable guidance on our expectations. Last summer that is why we declined to join the fdic
Problem after problem after problem and nothing we seemed to do seemed to be able to fix it. Moving antoine there was the right call. Hes dramatically improved production in almost every aspect of baltimore since hes been there. Its kind of like if you want to replace an infantry commander at ft. Riley, kansas, you dont go out and look at a bunch of applicants, you say who is my best infantry colonel or general promotable that i can put in that position. Antoine was the person in that case. If you could go back in time would you still have signed off all the moves highlighted in the Inspector Generals report . If i could go back in time i still would have made all the moves, yes. Thank you, mr. Chairman, i yield back. Mr. Pummill, is there any reason why you could not inform this committee of what the proposed actions are . Im sorry, congressman . Is there any reason you cant inform this committee as to what the proposed actions are . I was told by our Legal Advisers right before this
Fund if its insufficient to cover sfmtas expenditures for Transportation Services to the warriors project, then the warriors will be responsibility to comply with eir mitigations tr2b and t18. Motion by supervisor tang without objection. Colleagues we have the underlying item no. 2 as amended by both amendments. Motion to accept the item with full recommendation to the december 8th board of supervisors meet. Ing so moved. Motion by both supervisor tang and supervisor mar, well take it without objection. As to item 3 we have some technical amendments, discussed. Can i have a motion to accept the technical amendments. So moved. Motion by supervisor mar this time. Well take that out objection and to move item 3 to the full board to the december 8th board meeting. Motion to that effect . So moved motion by supervisor tang, take that without objection. [ gavel ]. Colleagues all right all all item no. 4, take those without objection and underlying to separate send it forward with full recomm