reagan-gorbachev summits, the devil is in the details. they can come away saying that i like that guy and we are not throwing verbal missiles at each other but in the end, the devil is in the details. i would think the u.s. is going to want to declaration from north korea, what s in your arsenal? how many bombs? where are they? how many long-range and medium-range missiles do you have? and then there s going to have to be some kind of a verification procedure. before you begin to remove them, you ve got to know what is there. they are going to want a declaration and they re going to want to check the declaration and ensure because i m sure we have some human intel on the ground, well, it s interesting. you said you have missiles here and you allow us to check it but can you let us check the other place? we never got anything close to that ie iran nuclear deal. we are going to need, i think president trump is that we are
rick sentencing el. gentlemen, welcome. and joe, i d like to begin with you. what was the president basing that criticism on lo these many months? do you think he actually did a granular destruction of the iran deal or who had his ear, question one. and question two is for americans smart enough to be watching this broadcast tonight, what s in it for them? why should they if your view is support the iran deal? well, brian, it would be very interesting to know if the president understands what s in the iran deal. if somebody were to ask him to describe it because it s very hard to believe that the president would disagree with the deal that required iran to shrink its program down to a fracture of its former size before the deal and then wrap it in an unprecedented verification procedure. i don t understand why the president doesn t believe his national security team when they tell him to a person the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the
shrink its program down to a fraction of its former size before the deal and then wrap it in an unprecedented verification procedure. i don t understand why the president doesn t believe his national security team when they tell him to a person the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the national security adviser that this is a good deal in america s national security interests. i don t think he understands what s in it. i think he s trapped in a campaign rhetoric. it became a political point. the republicans opposed the deal because a democratic president had negotiated it, and so what s in america s interests right now, this deal is supported by all our allies, all our european allies. it s supported by people who were formerly opposed to the deal like chuck schumer in the senate, senator cork rin, like the saudis, like the israeli military and saudi leaders. why? because it stops iran from getting a bomb. here s the real risk.
president would disagree with a deal that required iran to shrink its program down to a fraction of its former size before the deal and then wrap it in an unprecedented verification procedure. i don t understand why the president doesn t believe his national security team when they tell him to a person the secretary of state, the secretary of defense, the national security adviser that this is a good deal in america s national security interests. i don t think he understands what s in it. i think he s trapped in a campaign rhetoric. it became a political point. the republicans opposed the deal because a democratic president had negotiated it, and so what s in america s interests right now, this deal is supported by all our allies, all our european allies. it s supported by people who were formerly opposed to the deal like chuck schumer in the senate, senator cork rin, like the saudis, like the israeli military and saudi leaders. why? because it stops iran from getting a bomb.