Page 5 - Viewpoint Discrimination News Today

Took an oath to bring justice. she is supposed to focus on taking criminals to justice. thats not donald trump. he is an honest person. its no different than rittenhouse and anybody else that has a different opinion. its called viewpoint discrimination. its unconstitutional and leticia james has to be stoppedf >> tammy: people were doing a lot of interviews. she runs for office. has to raise money and get elected. part of the foundation what have she was doing were likeon many people who felt li...

A Christian student group has filed a lawsuit against the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, accusing the school of wrongfully denying funding for a guest speaker.

A Christian student group has filed a lawsuit against the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, accusing the school of wrongfully denying funding for a guest speaker.

A Christian student group has filed a lawsuit against the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, accusing the school of wrongfully denying funding for a guest speaker.

Protests or not and youre not putting on a list someone who chases a united states senator into a bathroom, thats weird. i dont know what the legal term for weird is, but thats weird. [laughter] >> well, there are a number of legal terms for it. at least one of them would be viewpoint discrimination. in other words, government cant pick and choose among the type of speech it likes and say were going to crack town on speech thats -- down on speech thats critical of the administrations priorities ...

Facebook and it is in our best interests to make sure we have equal right to these platforms or applied evenly. jillian: where do you fall on section 230 and if it should be repealed and do you think your end result would be to have the freedom you want on these platforms? what do you think your end game should be? >> the end game should be to restore the original purpose of section 230 which was to give platforms a shield from liability and ability to moderate content on their platforms the con...

Attorneys ethan bearman and david bruno. welcome back. statement from one of the plaintiff says black lives matter of course but so do all other human lives. posting blm signs and disallowing all lives matter signs is political speech or viewpoint discrimination. ethan. >> its not viewpoint discrimination. it fails the public forum doctor entitled the goods going to hold up under that argument. if this is a public space, if it was a bulletin board, they would not be able to do that. the school p...

These arguments and discussing things on the social media platform that involve your job you can engage in viewpoint discrimination, you dont like my viewpoint so you exclude me. the question, did she create a public forum by the manner she went about her twitter account. the trump case is different because they conceded he uses it for official purposes. ocasio, the court will have to determine. if they determined that. >> it is a public forum, shes conducting official business. you can follow e...

Trademark line, fuct. what are the implications for the first amendment? >> an interesting case because you see justin kagan sort of taking a hard line here, saying the american legal system stands up for the first amendment in terms of not having viewpoint discrimination. the government doesnt get to say whats scandalous and not. but on the other hand, you are justice sotomayor, laying out the fact, are we taking a step too far towards allowing racial slurs to be trademarked and things that mos...

You can see it on his hat. they cited a provision of trademark law that makes it illegal to give trademarks that are scandalous or immoral. the supreme court said thats viewpoint discrimination. it means the trade mark office would only support trademarks if the view was consistent with societys view of what is right and proper or moral and thats viewpoint discrimination. on that basis, the maker of that clothing line can now get trademark sfrprotection for his name. interesting line up of justi...