asw, as a result, judge doty issued unhinge ad sanctioneral against all federal government employees from having contac tntact with social media companies and discouraging or removingwi free speech. that means the cdc, the fbi, the doeansj, the white house. the judge specifically. namechecked. white house spokeswoman. karine jean-pierre. hhs secretary xavier becerracrer and surgeon general vivek murthy. noy n generalw on your screen if prohibited activities for the feds, which include meeting, emailing, flagging, callin meetingg, collaborating, threatening, urging, following up or issuing bolo g,s. be on the lookout for censoredt content with social media. it is an absolutelye ce stunning rebuke of the censorship deep state and the biden administrationnsp and it s a win for free speech. r, the bidenou administration has appealed this judge s injunction. k now, judges don t usually talk like this. they don t issue such scathinghi opinions or broad injunctions. why here? well,
the approved thought, you know, dangerous. ous. benjamin weingarten wrote today in the new york post. imaginten wrote an america withc search. actual speech police wherever chatter on social media questions the integrity of the vote speechgrity of. police who then take to the airwaves to attack those makinai the claims. if this sounds farfetched, consider that last summeetchedry a national security agency actually mulled the idea of deploying a rapid response team to local jurisdictions to help election officials fend off miss this and mail information. mdm related threats, including through communications, an idea that one fed called fascinating. now that dystopia was our reality, we now know, thanks to a new report from the houso a e weaponization committee, the report reveals how an agencls how ay, cisa, wha originally tasked with combating foreign cyberattacks and defending the grid, came to target americans.