Page 2 - Vote Task News Today

Were talking about. Okay. Anyway, it could possibly go there. Somewhere in that range. I think on the chapter 2 question, i would probably not change the burden. I think the standard of proof and burden to be kind of makes sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden...

Thanks. Respectfully i disagreeing with member pillpa with respect to burden of proof, with respect to chapter 2. The fact that the matter has been referred from the task force means that the task force has found a violation. Perhaps a willful one. And i think that the burden of proof should definitely rest with the resplendent in that case. As a matter of fact, i think that if you recall, when the task force refers were not looking for readjudication. Again, we have five new members and its pos...

Different powers and duties and i wouldnt want to complete those. I think i have said enough for the moment. Thanks. Respectfully i disagreeing with member pillpa with respect to burden of proof, with respect to chapter 2. The fact that the matter has been referred from the task force means that the task force has found a violation. Perhaps a willful one. And i think that the burden of proof should definitely rest with the resplendent in that case. As a matter of fact, i think that if you recall...

There was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding of task force for the commission in the event that the commission doesnt overturn the tank ask force. I think the task force and the commission stand separately and i would not subject that you take the Task Force Recommendation on its own. You can choose to, but i dont think there should be a regthat provides in the absence of a Commission Decision to the contrary. I think there are really different powers and duties and i wouldnt wa...

Sense. That is what the whole basis of the chapter 2 versus 3 thing was. I think i would be better with three positive votes needed to make a finding that there was a violation. So even if it requires three votes to find a violation, you can still hold the person to the burden, if they didnt meet their burden, then you go the other way. Although it does play out in the same ways that we have talked about. I also would not substitute there was a suggestion at one point to substitute the finding o...

Task force previously constituted, the consensus and a very strong consensus of the task force has been were not sending matters to you for readjudication. Were sending them for enforcement of our orders of determination. I agree. The point of this was to provide some deference to the task force decision and i for one am comfortable with the possibility on a 22 vote a task force find would be upheld, if the commission felt that the [tphaebz ] were [prerpbt ] felt that was propriety. If they felt...

Congestion. The vehicle fleet rehabilitation, again, as im sure you know from personal experience the break downs that occur within the vehicle fleet because of the vehicles are not being overhauled and replaced in a timely way and then converting the bus to 60 passengers and improving the maintenance sufficienty my rebuilding our maintenance facilities. Rapid Network Enhancement includes better Market Street, the implementation of the transit effectiveness project and the gary Network Improveme...

Mr. Chatfield. Hopefully i will make it easier. Cause of hearing was developed because because there was a concern had a something coming from the task force, they have already made a decision. So the commission wanted to ensure that that commission or that decision was sort of coming in. The presumption is a violation has occurred when had he come here. So the respondent has to show why the task force was incorrect in making that decision for you to move on the showcause part, not chapter 3. So...

I wouldnt want to complete those. I think i have said enough for the moment. Thanks. Respectfully i disagreeing with member pillpa with respect to burden of proof, with respect to chapter 2. The fact that the matter has been referred from the task force means that the task force has found a violation. Perhaps a willful one. And i think that the burden of proof should definitely rest with the resplendent in that case. As a matter of fact, i think that if you recall, when the task force refers wer...

Sunshine task force finding remains goes into effect. Becomes our finding, because we were split 22, i. E. , dont have a threeperson vote. Or as we discussed earlier, could we carried forward to a subsequent meeting. If the commissioners at the 22 say that was a complicated hardfought and sincere, this is one that we really ought to bring forward to the next meeting and allow the fifth commissioner the possibilities of doing this by a 32 vote, whichever way that commissioner should go. But i thi...