came in. 2013, the court did shelby versus holder. it required states that had a history of suppressing voter laws to first preclear any changes in their electoral processes with the department of justice. when the court invalidated the preclearance regime in shelby county, it is shortest that section to the voting rights act still remained as a vehicle for challenging discriminatory voting laws and here we are today, seeing whether or not the court agrees that section two will continue to be a viable remedy for these kind of discriminatory voter claims. the issue here in alabama that alabama drew a series of redistricting that s basically packed black voters into a single majority minority district. based on the population and racially polarized voting patterns of alabama, federal district court determined that it was likely that there could
this is a really big, case ayman. if you recall back in 2013, the court decided shelby county versus holder, which invalidated the preclearance formula. preclearance is a regime that requires states with a history of repressive voter lost to first preclear any changes in their electoral processes with the department of justice. when the court invalidated the preclearance regime in shelby county, it assured us that section two of the voting rights act still remained as a vehicle for challenging discriminatory voter laws. and here we are today seeing whether or not the court agrees that section two will continue to be a viable remedy for these kind of discriminatory voter claims. and the issue here in alabama is alabama drew a series of legislative district-ing maps that basically packed black voters into a single minority, majority, minority district. and based on the population and the racially polite voting patterns in alabama, a federal district court determined that it is likely t
but since august the angle has told you that this was untrue. but they re still trying to put lipstick on a donkey here. the new york times nate combs did his best makeup job saying the idea democrats can hold the house is not as ridiculous inplausible and farfetched as it did before the dobbs overturned row versus wade. it s a real possibility not in the sense that anything can happen. other pretend reporters at politico are trying a new line flying the idea that rural voters are demoralized and won t show up to vote. now, they hang this wishful thinking in politico on the slightly rural lower turnout in a few recent special elections. then they attribute this to the dobbs decision. and then they extrapolate to indicate that this could press voting patterns in november. this is ludicrous.
and grandparents, how will that factor in in the midterm elections in terms of their voting patterns. to start with, many latinos might identify themselves first as american and then as latinos they might feel not that much solidarity with the latino community. because as you said, they are second or third generation. so that s important, and also it s important to know the latino voter is younger than the general electorate. that s something i think that benefits democrats. there are more latino voters between 18 to 34 years old. and they have a more progressive point of view. i think that s something also to consider. telemundo anchor julio viqueriro, thank you for coming on the show this morning. ukrainian troops are gaining
country who have a hard time paying off their student loan debt. maybe we have to have a more surgical approach. especially to black and latino women who have had the hardest time securing and paying off those loans. that s a completely different conversation. but here you have over 40 million people who are going to be helped by this. the funny thing if you look at voting patterns and millennials and gen z, they are concerned about it. it is not a guaranteed vote for democrats. if this generational theft is a ploy to get younger, longer-term voters it s immoral and disgusting. bill: to the tune of $420 billion. joe manchin might not get his pill through. it has a poison pill. he would led the feds socialize