to allow this story has caused hurt to the story. and the columbia school of journalism said it was a failure that was avoidable. in the aftermath of the story s public unraveling not just the writer but the editors at rolling stone took shelter under the defense that the reason they had to have this unravel on them was they were too sensitive to jackie s position. the evidence doesn t support that defense. so among the findings rolling stone didn t contact two friends, known only as jackie who they claim to spoken with about the attack. and didn t talk with jackie s attackers and didn t allow the university to respond to the allegations which were later
believe you are an organization called one and four an all male sexual assault peer education group at uva and your intention is to help those that have stories to tell to help those be believed about sexual violence happened to them in a college setting. do you think this story will create a chilling effect where victims who feel they don t have a voice are even more silenced? i think we ve been working to do since the story broke is to combat what you are calling a chilling effect. i don t think it will have a chilling effect. in the individuals in one to four have talked about that numerous women have come forward in response to the amount of attention shown bringing forward the stories and they have felt empowered to tell their story. now saying this i don t want to in any way say it empowered the
rolling stone article was serious about helping women it would not have approached the story in this manner. meanwhile, the university itself has to live under the stigma of this article which is now been retracted and now has been discredited by the columbia journalism review. theresa sullivan said in a statement that the rolling stone article did nothing to combat sexual violence and may have damaged the cause to help young women. it is irresponsible journalism she said that unjustly damaged the reputations of many here on campus, including entire university of virginia community. word travels fast about this and now we have the follow-up from columbia, putting a real linchpin into the fact that this story was bogus. what s the reaction been on campus? well people are relieved that at least it has been
ideas come into this world ugly and messy. they are the natural born enemy of the way things are. yes, ideas are scary and messy and fragile. but under the proper care, they become something beautiful. a failure avoidable. the vow rape story takes a dramatic turn. good afternoon. i m tauri. as we come on the air, now fallout about a rape on campus. today the rolling stone retraction about the bombshell
and a eagle and a trash can right there. art. and with this story, if you live in the u.s. or the u.k. you have been hacked and that is what the con man turned con abernathy has said. and he inspired the movie with leonardo dicaprio said you have been hacked. and i agree with that. i was at a store in at a target in texas buying things there and i was nowhere near texas. and something we ve put out there and the convenience factor trying to balance the two. the society we live in. check your bill. i m not there. one thing to follow is breaking news story about the rolling stone discredited story about the rape on campus.