Walker Decision News Today

A conservative majority seems set on restricting voting rights.

You know -- >> we watched the screen. so obviously legally speaking i think it is very significant day. this is the type of two cases read years from now in law schools and in legal books across the country, thats what i was thinking of first thing when i heard about it. i am not surprised by the ruling, we covered this on is it legal for oreilly, the 5-4 decision authored by justice kennedy, striking down doma. your thoughts and reflections? >> i wasnt surprised, but theres a lot to learn about...

2008, it is a bureaucratic issue. you made fun of me for saying culture is baked into the cake of the bureaucracy. the irs is not the only government agency that has conferences like this. theres more of them. >> are you saying ban cakes? >> i thought thats what she was talking about. >> coconut cake you buy at dwayne reed for the 500 anniversary. >> i loved it. >> theres so many cool things you can get at the drugstore. coconut cake isnt one of them. you can live in the drugstore. next time you...

2008, it is a bureaucratic issue. you made fun of me for saying culture is baked into the cake of the bureaucracy. the irs is not the only government agency that has conferences like this. theres more of them. >> are you saying ban cakes? >> i thought thats what she was talking about. >> coconut cake you buy at dwayne reed for the 500 anniversary. >> i loved it. >> theres so many cool things you can get at the drugstore. coconut cake isnt one of them. you can live in the drugstore. next time you...

Marriage, you are pleased today. for those that are disappointed in the decision, there are things to look into here that there was a victory of principles over government overreach, if youre looking at it from a legal perspective. politically, i think in some ways this begins the long road to having gay marriage no longer be a political weapon used by either side and gives people a chance to then focus on other important issues that we have in the country. >> bob? >> two things struck me, first...

Itself. >> because california constitution were talking about, not the federal constitution. >> i understand that. but then they shouldnt have brought it up. >> they were able to side step the issue. >> not even go 5-4, deciding not to make a decision. >> what eric is saying is right, didnt make decision with regard to merits of the rights, being a protected right in proposition 8. what they did do, you cant just go to the voters, theres an issue, people feel you shouldnt disenfranchise the will...

Latest updates on this topic.