part of an assassination conspiracy was too weird to be believed. he was also a homosexual and closeted and i think that played a part. this decision to arrest clay shaw i believe was intended to get the national media back to town. as soon as he arrested clay shaw they all came back. and then they realized the truth that there isn t anything there. garrison has based his case on the certainty that he can prove clay shaw. the name was first introduced by dean andrew that told the warren commission a person by that name telephone him suggesting he provide legal defense for lee oswald. he described him as having gay tendencies and representing gays as a lawyer. therefore, fwgarrison believed that must be clay shaw.
truth that there isn t anything there. garrison has based his case on the certainty that he can prove clay shaw is clay or clin bertrand. the name was first introduced by a lawyer named dean andrews who told the warren commission a person by that name telephoned him suggesting he provide legal defense for lee oswald. dean had described clem bertrand as having gay tendencies and representing gays as a lawyer, therefore, garrison believed clem bertrand must be clay shaw. that was the extent of garrison s investigation. you have enough evidence now to go to trial? well, if i answer that i shouldn t be district attorney. the case he has built against clay shaw is based on testimony that did not pass a lie detector test that garrison ordered, and garrison knew it. you are saying positively that the person you knew as clay
truth that there isn t anything there. garrison has based his case on the certainty that he can prove clay shaw is clay or clin berkelin first introduced by a lawyer named dean andrews who told the warren commission a person by that name telephoned him suggesting he provide legal defense for lee oswald. he had described clem berkeelin as having guy tendencies and representing guys as a lawyer. therefore garrison believed clem bertrand must be clay shaw. that was the extent of garrison s investigation. do you have enough evidence now to go to trial? well, if i answered that, i shouldn t be district attorney. the case he has built is based on testimony that didn t pass a lie detector test garrison ordered and garrison