that they weren t followed. the book should stop with the prime minister for what happened in the number ten, his office, if you like, and he clearly wasn t in control. it is quite long for him to hire expensive lawyers and try to hide behind them and then throwjunior staff to the wolves quite wrong. sue gray s interim report concluded it was a failure of leadership and judgment, a damning indictment. it is clear to me that if the police say levels of the premise should go. but me that if the police say levels of the premise should go. the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as i the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as far i the premise should go. but boris johnson himself, as far as far as | the premise should go. but boris i johnson himself, as far as far as we understand, hasn t b
handle this to the extent that we can. so the guy leading the jury and also kind of the judge says he has the same position as the defendant? surely senate majority leader mitch mcconnell spoke, right? wrong. exactly how we go forward, i m going to coordinate with the president s lawyers, so there won t be any difference between us on how to do this. that was the second time. he said it again. anyway, to be fair, tom daschle, senate minority leader during the clinton impeachment so he wasn t in control, but he was the ranking member of his party. he tells cnn he didn t personally speak to the president during the process, but his team was in constant contact with the white house coordinating the moving parts. what s the difference? one, he wasn t in power of the process, right? he wasn t in control. the idea that, well, they all stink, no, not here. there s a big difference between
he has the same position as the defendant? surely senate majority leader mitch mcconnell spoke, right? wrong. exactly how we go forward, i m going to coordinate with the president s lawyers, so there won t be any difference between us on how to do this. that was the second time. he said it again. anyway, to be fair, tom daschle, senate minority leader during the clinton impeachment so he wasn t in control, but he was the ranking member of his party. he tells cnn he didn t personally speak to the president during the process, but his team was in constant contact with the white house coordinating the moving parts. what s the difference? one, he wasn t in power of the process, right? he wunts in control. the idea that, well, they all stink, no, not here. there s a big difference between letting the white house know what s going on when you re not even in control and asking the white house what should happen. that s what republicans are doing, and they are continuously subordinating
those eyes. you could see it, which perhaps led to anger with all the rules and the fact that she wasn t in control. either take the rod out of my ass or just stick it on in. all right. y all ready? during our stay at tennessee, culbertson s disciplinary write-ups played a major role in her being denied parole. recommend she be granted parole at this time would have an adverse effect on the institutional discipline. ms. culbertson, i m going to recommend you be confined for the balance of your sentence. thank you. you have a good day. three days later she received a new disciplinary write-up. they charged me with disrespect. i was in church. i had my arm on the chair and a girl touched my arm and it s disrespect. i disrespected the chaplain. she s homophobic so what s the worst case? they re gonna [ bleep ] me. what does that mean? you see that building right there? i m going to lockdown. it s a jail within a jail, segregation. this kind of stuff is what took
that he never drank to excess, including a classmate who said he never saw kavanaugh in a state where he wasn t in control. with me cnn law analyst josh campbell, once a special agent for the fbi. back at it again today. we have heard from democrat senator chris coons, from dianne feinstein, both of whom say they do not believe that this fbi report they believe it should be kept confidential. no matter the findings at the end of the week, keep it sealed. you disagree with that. i do, who heartleheartedly. why? the intense investigation surrounding this nomination, if these lingering questions aren t answered, not only by politicians, by people who have an ax to grind, some sort of