they are getting hit hard on this witchhunts. when they look at the information it is a joke. impeachment for that? this is the nation s top intelligence official, joseph mcguire testifies in open session before the house intelligence committee where chairman adam schiff calls it deeply troubling seeking answers as to why it was withheld for weeks. it is attractive see that this was withheld as long as it was because it wasn t urgent matter, it is an urgent matter and there was no basis to keep this from the committee. we will hear what mcguire has to say, questions about what we may here. how far can they go and open session and did they play any role to assess the credibility of the whistleblower? chris stewart who has seen the complaint had this to say.
million during a regular competition. so far he has raked in $532,000 with 19 straight wins. the time is 39 after the top of the hour and sparks flying on capitol hill as a former police officer rips democrats are hearing about banning assault weapons. please don t legislate the 150 million people just like me into being criminals. it has happened. you have already done it. hear her powerful message next, also the majority of voters are against impeaching donald trump but that doesn t matter to aoc. why she is putting both sides of the aisle on glass.
there was nothing untoward about the phone call in my opinion. shannon: what about the whistleblower complaint we expect later today? what can you tell us about that? they released it at 10:30. haven t gotten ready for it, i had a reader early this morning at haven t had a chance to look at it yet. it is a he said she said. anybody can make a claim but the more important thing is there are two travesties. number one, what appears to be a selling of influence and the fact that thes would go after a duly elected president on hearsay that they ve not even read. two scandals here is unbelievable. shannon: it seems different from what was being said by many of the same democrats in 1998 and we can flash back to reflash
back-and-forth going on on this, do you know if the investigation was going on into the company at the time the prosecutor was removed from office, that there was pressure from the vice president of the time, joe biden, for him to be removed, was the investigation going on at the time? obviously there was an investigation going on at the time. i still think the firing of the prosecutor was the right thing to do and the united states was absolutely right to push for it. the other prosecutor called me, this is the guy who closed the case later and also for all the wrong reasons the case was closed because there was a whole group of ukrainian corrupt officials so when the lens he says he has to drain the swamp he has to deal with those corrupt cases. this is not somebody pushing the
call that is now famous between the president and the president of ukraine, what is your take on it? you nailed it, no quid pro quo and no secret, democrats pretty much on november 9, 2016, said their tactics were going to be resist, obstruct, impeach. roi doesn t stand for return on investment. they been battling against this newly elected president forever. the fact that they were bringing this out, didn t go through proper channels or business committees, now they have an inquiry, the spanish had an inquiry they call the spanish inquisition and this is reminder full for me of that. they are going after this president on any and everything they can. i read the transcript, there is no quid pro quo. this is another witchhunt. should nancy pelosi specifically be held accountable for this now that we know what is in the transcript seeing how she called for this official