Want to put too much credence in letters. I thought i would sneak that in. Is there, the chairman was suggesting in his time that you could have waived the role to bring the public in at an earlier date at a drafting of the rule. Your answer to that was a little bit to read a cold, yes i have that power, but it is not a power practice. Following up on the question why in looking at that did you not avail yourself . Wheeler there are many reasons why. You put out a draft, what do you do two days later when paragraph 345 gets changed . Do you put it out again and say, look at this . Had you deal with the back and forth between offices. How do you deal with ongoing research. Is it right to have this kind of an activity that can be very much affecting of capital markets, people misinterpreting this or that. Markets crashing or inflating whatever the case may be. It is for that reason, that foia and specific says that these kind of editorial negotiations are specifically works in progress.
We normally ask for your testimony, but we are very forgiving on this and we would appreciate your verbal comments. Your entire written statement will be part of the written record. Mr. Wheeler. Chair wheeler thank you very much mr. Chairman. Members of the committee, i will take that hand as well as your forgiveness and try and skip through early paragraphs. Im proud of the process that the commission ran to develop the open Internet Order. It was one of the most open and transparent in commission history. And the Public Participation was unprecedented trade last april i circulated a draft, that included a set of open internet protections, and also asked questions about the best way to achieve an open internet. The open internet npr and adopted in may proposed a solution based on section 706 do the calculations act of 1996. Telecommunications act of seven and 1996. Whether title ii of the act of 1934 would be a better solution. A quick point on procedures. While historically some npr
Print this article
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman tested positive for the coronavirus and said that she believes that some of her Republican colleagues who refused to wear face coverings as lawmakers gathered in a secure room during last week s breach of the U.S. Capitol building may be to blame.
Watson Coleman, a New Jersey Democrat who joined Congress in 2015, will turn 76 on Feb. 6. Following the events of Wednesday, including sheltering with several colleagues who refused to wear masks, I decided to take a Covid test. I have tested positive, Watson Coleman wrote in a tweet on Monday.
After House lawmakers were ushered out of the House chamber when supporters of President Trump breached the Capitol last week, they were brought to an undisclosed, secure location for hours.