Only 20 was weighted on cost and 80 on more fermorral things and technical merit things. I find that interesting just to get an idea how staff is weighing these things before they say heres the award and i think that would be a good policy for us to have when we have the evaluation and everything lets see the scores because that will tell us the weighting and give us an idea how staff is thinking when they do have competitive bids. Okay. We can include that. Director reiskin. Just one question on the temporary facilities which doesnt seem like its necessarily that unique of scope of work. Why do we think we only had one bidder . Its actually about three reasons that we thought we would have more. We did have 100 f. T. E. On it so that was one component. Also the fact thattan vil was on site already. The fact they were there and a known entity to other bidders. The temporary facilities which is a wide range because you can imagine its logistical. With a very hot market a lot of the Smal
Competitiveness of the bidding environment we need to get three or four bidders. You get one or two bids there is a margin of 10, 20, 30 above what the package should cost. I will note that the biggest contract here is the temporary facilities and there was only one bidder i believe and that recommended award is less than the estimate. Yeah. This is a timing materials contract. Director sartipi. If the highest risk is the number of bidders what do when we interview the contractors that picked up the package what is their responses to why theyre not bidding . Is it not value . Is it difficult . Is it complex . Or theyre busy someplace else . Theyre saying theyre busy someplace else but let me bring in webcore. They directly talk to the contractors. I could use a life line here. So mostly it is the fact they have other opportunities in the market place elsewhere that they find more attractive. For example, the metal stairs we had nine prequalified bidders and the first time we only had o
In construction, and since the may Board Meeting and that includes the award and elevators and escalators and the roof top and the facilities the difference between the amounts and the cng estimates was 2. 5 million and as i mentioned, they did in august, for the plumbing and inaudible system. And we see five bids for the plumbing and trade packages, and with the distance and excluding it, and raging between 68. 7 and 25. 4 million, inaudible and the back in 15. 69 Million Dollars, and the cng estimate is inaudible . And the recommended award, amount is 15. 7 million which includes a deduct for the clear water, system for the wetlands, and accepted, the proposals and the optional deduct, the credit for doing both of the plumbing and the mechanical, which is the hvc system and it is the amount of the 15. 4 million and that is 8. 55 million and, delivers the estimate and 96,000 above the budget, and the scope of the plumbing package does not include the elements on the roof top park. And
Actually happening and we have demolition going, and we have mobilization for the Foundation Piles and the cidh piles and the brett pile that makes up the pile on the support for the bridge, but i did just want to recap how that works and this screen line represents the route from the bay bridge, and highway 80 down to the Transit Center, and this is just an overview of that to remind you, of the scope of work and of course, that includes, the cable state bridge, and the main work that is happening and so far we are about to go into the cdih, and the deep pile of the Foundation Work up on the via duct route and we are also starting the brett pile work or the preparation for the brett pile work which is this whole here, which is completely shored and that equipment is moving in shortly, to start work working on that. And as far as the utility relocation, and the executive director mentioned that we are going to get that water line finished this month, and ptand e get out of the way but
Director lee recusing herself and approve items nine and at the point and we will get her back in the room before we call item eleven. Director lee is back in the room and i will call the next item item eleven,approving an amendment to contract no. 0804cmgc000, authorizing Webcor Obayashi joint venture to award a trade work subcontract to transbay fire protection, inc. As the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid in the amount of 6,860,000 for tg10. 5 fire suppression, thereby increasing authorized direct costs by 6,860,000 and the authorized Construction Services fixed fee by 521,360. And mark will present on this item. Any questions. Ne questions from the board. Could we take a motion on this item . A motion and a second. Any members of the public. Lets take roll call on thit em. Director lee. Lee, aye. Nuru. Aye. Reiskin. Aye. Harper. Aye. And kim. Aye. And as well tha, is five ayes and item eleven is approved. Great. Eare there any other items or announcements . T