as we talked over two years you didn t say i ll only abide by bob mueller report if donald trump testifies. no, you said i would because i was told by the united states of the president that he would testify. and if i don t like the finding i m going to go to jerry nadler. they didn t find a crime. they did not find a crime either. he left it to congress. so i was a former prosecutor. you re a lawyer. we don t exonerate. we no, you don t. and that is weird language and i need to hear him explain why he used it. is there enough evidence to prosecute this case? that is my decision that i make. he didn t find it. he didn t make a referral for a criminal prosecution. he said he couldn t. he s not in the business of exonerating and by the way this is an investigation that was total bogus. there was no russia collusion and now democrats are trying to say there was no russia collusion but we think he attempted to obstruct. he didn t obstruct the investigation.
and now you re speculating. hold on a second, sean, it is not on me to tell you who wrote it. the document is legitimate, it comes from the irs. it echoed what is in their manual and the onus is on you to protect the president to say it is bogus, not on me. the onus on you is to report the official stance of the irs. which is not contained in that memo. but in the manual and the same as the memo. and what we re told is you have to have a legitimate legislative purpose and to harass the president of the united states because you want to continue the russia farce investigation, have at it. but here is my point, chris. let s stop moving the goalpost. let s abide by the law. the president is not required to disclose his taxes and he did a summary and on the last show you said bob mueller is the gold standard, whatever he said we have to abide by. yes. well bob mueller did his report and then i can t believe it because he didn t find anything on obstruction because the pre
up by force. second, disclosure is the best way to get the closure this president says he wants. if you diss disclosure there is no closure. people will never clear you of what must be answered for. and third, manning up, giving the investigators what they need is also the best way to show that this president is in office to do something for other people, not just himself. and at the end of the day that has to be what it is about for a president of the united states. he holds the key. he can either go along with what they want. he knows what everybody s going to say. he should have nothing to fear. he just said he s the most transparent. put them out there. most importantly bob mueller. he s still at the doj and i don t know why. they should put him out there. they should offer him up right now. i don t care if he wants to do it or not, it s his duty.
when he didn t listen, chris, when it mattered. he didn t testify. read the report. mueller said we had a lot of other evidence to work with but we needed that. because you re a very smart lawyer, chris, and you would never in a million years let your client testify if he didn t need to. i have a different analysis. and i ll offer when you are done. chris no, finish your point, dave. go ahead. my analysis is this. i agree with you 100%, the raskins, sekulow, julguiliani, , amy, he s the president of the united states and he said he wanted to go there under oath and he said he owed that as being president and he had nothing to hide. he owes the people of this country a debt of service. he served them. and he should have sat down if he had nothing to hide and answered the man s questions. even the written questions, amy. her turn. even the written questions didn t handle obstruction.
how is that transparent? chris, so you would advise the president of the united states to go against the legal advice from his team? i find that hard to believe. he did what his team wanted him to do. and he didn t go under oath. he answered the questions, the mueller report played out and there was no collusion and there was no obstruction. end of story. there was no finding of criminal conspiracy. there was collusion and attempts to collude and they couldn t make a determination of obstruction because he didn t testify. can i tell you something and mueller s hands were tied by the olc. this is the thing, is that this is sour grapes. democrats have been having a temper tantrum since hillary clinton lost. they can not get over it. they cannot move on. every time they look at donald trump, they see what could have been. when they had the women s march, they weren t there because donald trump had done something to them. they were there he s trying to take away their right