didn't know they were turning other people off. people want to see sports as nonpolitical. politics stays out of the game. it doesn't need to be there. i mentioned he's in hot water. we talked about this. sports media doesn't like what phil had to say because so many sports media are on the far left. and i mean that with personal experience. very far left. and they see their own belief as nonpolitical, just simply on the side of morality. and so when somebody like jackson -- i don't know that he's conservative. >> that would be news to me. >> i don't know his politics. he said sports should be free of politics and they say no, you should endorse our politics. >> no doubt. that's extra happened, -- a that's what happened during covid, started with the blm stuff. nba different than bud light. bud light getting into a far left cause because that's what corporations do these days based on the pressures they have. you can go from the blue can to a silver can very easily. more difficult to say i'm
Town boss Paul Jewell says loan midfielder Jimmy Bullard will be given every chance to be fit for Saturday’s trip to Leeds. With Bullard having a hamstring injury, skipper David Norris suspended and Colin Healy out with a stomach problem the Blues manager has looked to the loan market, but so far without success.
president trump and spoke of milley in the days following the insurrection. what was her biggest concern, do you think? >> it's interesting, we knew this phone call had happened from our reporting, but what phil and carol having the book are the exact details of what was said. and just to go through it quickly. so pelosi is on the phone with milley and she says this guy's crazy, he's dangerous, he's a maniac, we have deep concerns. milley. . ma'am, i guarantee you we have checks and balance in the system and walked her through the process of nuclear release authorities, ma'am, i guarantee these processes are very good. there's not going to be an accidental firing of nuclear weapons. pelosi, how can you guarantee me. ma'am, there's a process. we will only follow legal orders, we'll only do things that are legal, ethical and
FDP-Programm zur Bundestagswahl: Die Liberalen rufen zum „Aufholwettbewerb" auf - Politik tagesspiegel.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tagesspiegel.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
republicans are hearing back home from their constituents. the one thing related to this but i want to add to what phil and manu were saying about how critical this phase is about how the articles of impeachment, not just how many but how they're crafted. i agree that it struck me when she said that the president leaves us no choice but talks about how he could corrupt the election again. it's entirely possible that that phrase or that notion would be part of an article of impeachment of abuse of power dealing with ukraine. and the reason is because, like phil was saying, i am also hearing from the most important majoritymakers. the house democrats who are in very big trump districts. even this morning, i was communicating with one. make it narrow. make it quick, and let's move on. and she is hearing that. she's hearing other things from
president on this idea, but white house officials informed staff on capitol hill this is not something they are pursuing. democrats want no part of this. they have been led down this path before and republicans at the white house decided not to go in that direction. it's not on the table and we will see what happens. right now, no. >> thank you very much for the reporting. with me to share their reporting and insights. karen with "the washington post" and sirius xm. nancy cook with politico and npr. happy friday, everybody. >> let's just go off of what phil and abby were reporting. as we speak this meeting is taking place right now. you and i have covered a few
there's perfectly good justification to investigate the clintons for some of the things they have done. he has those statements out there. i can see what the president likes about them, but what phil says, you know, there's probably something to that, too, and here's a guy that is professional and may not take orders if they are political. >> definitely he has a record of saying things and written things about the president would like about what he wants the justice department to do, which is investigate hillary clinton and having skepticism of the mueller probe. but phil is right, if he gets into the job it's about what they see when they are in the role that might change their perception of what is going on. you are right about the timing here. george h.w. bush being laid to rest this week, a lot of people in the administration saw bill bar this week at the funeral, and he was at the national cathedral. i was interested to see that a
philosophical collisions that probably didn't get enough attention other than folks who cover the legal side of this, don mcgahn was never for what phil and matt have described, he was never for this sort of accommodation of bob mueller's requests on document production and witness participation. don mcgahn wanted and needed an ally on executive privilege. my questions today that have gone unanswered is how do you put the toothpaste back in the tube. don mcgahn has spent two full days with mueller's investigators. if you were going to exert executive privilege, i don't know with whom you do it. as you heard from the clip you played from cnn, bob mueller already knows more about the trump campaign, and i would imagine based on the questions that "the new york times" published this week, knows more about the way the white house functions than anybody else who works there. >> yeah. matt, you're agreeing? >> yeah. 100%.
way into the oval office to interview for an undisclosed job at the time. and that don mcgahn views him as his succession plan. if don mcgahn had his way, emmet flood will stay and don mcgahn will be gone in a matter of six to eight weeks. >> which firm again is a very rigorous way of doing it actually, to care enough about a hand-off to make it peaceful and orderly. >> and to find someone -- one of the big sort of legal philosophical collisions that probably didn't get enough attention, other than from folks like matt and people that covered the legal side of this, isn't that don mcgahn was never for what phil and matt have described. he was never for this sort of accommodation of bob mueller's requests on document production, on witness participation. don mcgahn always wanted and needed and lacked an ally on a more aggressive posture on executive privilege.