open season. and if the court is willing to reconsider roe as a draft opinion suggests, what about griswold, 1965 decision recognizing the right to contraception on which roe is predicated, the right to make our own choices when it comes to end of life medical decisions, what about same sex marriage, interracial marriage? these are all rights that in one way or another the supreme court has traced in part to the same understanding, i think there is another piece here which is apart from the legal reasoning and the threads that start to unravel with an opinion like this, there is the optics of it. if this court is willing to go back on roe for all of the reasons laura powerfully suggested has become so entrenched in parts of our society, what wouldn t it go back on? it seems to be not just about the doctrine, but about the court as an institution and its willingness to go back on things we have taken for granted in this country. laura coates, question here, there is an argument that t