Page 2 - Which Question News Today

Dossier -- what would you say, a political document opposition research or legitimate intelligence? >> sir, i would very much like to answer that question. >> okay. >> i have been directed by the fbi that i may not get into that based on operational requirements or equities. >> so heres the issue i think we have. we see the bias that you did. your explanations for why you said what you did really arent credible. were trying to get to the genesis of why open up a counter intelligence investigatio...

Question -- >> no. >> you raised the question whether i agreed with the inspector general that i had acted in any way that was biased. >> you had an opportunity to answer that earlier. >> i did not to this congressman. i did not. >> the gentleman from illinois is recognized for five minutes. >> thank you, mr. chair. thank you, mr. strzok. mr. strzok, on july 3rd, your lawyer, mr. goldman, made the following statement to chris cuomo on cnn regarding you, his client. on fox news they talk about hi...

Investigating someone, i actually did not. but lets go. lets go. we already passed the who gives an f, one more a.d. versus investigation leading to impeachment. i think we established there is a school of thought you can be impeached if youre not a current office holder. you can be barred from holding office in the future. but you did not engage in any impeachment analysis in your 2016 investigation with secretary clinton. you saved all of that for candidate trump. so, i want to go to another t...

I recall the penultimate, the second to last polygraph i had was i was washington field office. 2008, 2011. by out of scope, polygraphs have a five-year span of effectiveness or validity. we had several people we were trying to including me we were trying to get red into an intelligence department. they read some names, me and others were out of scope which happens because polygraphs were -- the line for polygraph -- >> i understand. im in the military, mr. strzok. i understand the delays in the...

>> i do not. >> what steps were taken to bring you into scope? >> i went and had a polygraph. >> okay. was this after the january 16 letter that you received? >> it would have been afterwards. yes. >> if you were out of scope, when was the last time you accessed classified information? >> last -- night before last preparing for this. >> do you currently -- you currently have what classification? >> i have a top secret clearance with some mesiac compartments. >> during the time you were out of sc...

Here and you have tried to answer their questions. and i have never seen my colleagues so out of control, so angry, and so desperate to protect a president that we all know is not fit to be president. so, i want to leave you this opportunity. is there any question on the table, mr. strzok, that you have been asked that you would like to clarify? because i can give you two minutes and 25 seconds to have your say uninterrupted. >> congresswoman, i deeply appreciate that time. i do want -- everybod...

Im not a security professional, but you appear to -- >> so youre out of sync right now with the answer received from the department of justice. that is an interesting answer that you just gave that you may have been out of sync. the question now becomes is policy procedure failed or not failed. this is a serious investigation which i take seriously. if you should have been read out you should have been read out. that is my final answer, statement, not oppose. i yield back. >> the gentleman from ...

The team leading the house. and the republican team overall. they have to lead as they campaigned and they said they would fix this stuff. there is a way to dial you have the pressure to get even more change than people believe is possible and avoid the default. the defaults premise for the president to say we are going to default, thats not the choice in front of us. bill: on that question, thats a question, thats an affirmative. do i hear it right? >> which question. bill: the house leadership...

Latest updates on this topic.

Unclassified setting. it appears from your transcript, sir, that you interpreted his question as, quote, whether or not there were any reciprocation of that by members of the trump team in offering their assistance back to russia. you later continued to explain, and im quoting from your transcript, as whether or not there was information about whether elements of the trump campaign were themselves engaging in that. i cant answer that in an unclassified setting, and furthermore, i dont think the ...