should happen? find them. find them. then what? they go to jail. how long should they go to jail. long it takes. like what? i don t know. go to jail for a while. that s as strong as you could get out of him? that s as strong as we could get out of him. not he ought to go to hell or i would personally electro cute him. i would personally electrocute him, she was my friend, she didn t deserve that, she wouldn t hurt a fly. there was nothing. narrator: his lack of emotion was suggestive that perhaps chris should move to the top of the list, but it was not evidence. after the interview chris mcamis was free to leave and detectives weren t any closer to learning what happened to lynsie ekelund, and neither was nancy, who
one, and who they needed was a guy named larry. tell me about larry. larry is larry is phenomenal. phenomenal because what, he sees things other cops don t see? phenomenal because he sees things cops don t see. i don t know anybody who could have done a better job than larry. narrator: the evidence whisperer was about to listen to what the facts of this case were really saying. was there something that police had missed? you bet. coming up that picture of the truck spotted on the night of the crime, something about it just doesn t seem right, but the evidence whisperer is all over it when dateline continues. it when dateline continues mm, uh, what do you do for fun? -not this. -oh, what am i into? mostly progressive s name your price tool. helps people find coverage options based on their budget.
night lynsie disappeared. she had been missing seven years and the case had gone from cold to frozen in time so plascencia pd decided to out source it to the cold case unit at the orange county office to a guy named larry montgomery. with more than 30 years working homicide larry has put away his share of bad guys, not usually by knocking on doors. instead larry works by looking closely at the evidence. he doesn t work fast. in fact, larry is meticulously slow, and that was just what this cold case needed. was there anything in the original investigation that struck you as something that you needed to reexamine? everything. everything that had led plascencia police into that wall, trying to decide between two suspects. i mean i m concerned about this girl, okay. you know, and she is missing.
night lindsey disappeared. sometimes the facts are as clear as the southern california sky, but other times you have to know where to look to see the truth. this man has made a career of noticing what others do not. what s his reputation? a meticulous investigator. just pours over the volumes of evidence and finds things that other investigators did not find. the evidence whisperer? correct. so that night i went out dancing. does this man act guilty? does he know more than he s saying. i mean i didn t know anything was going on, all right. i was just, where is lindsey, okay. what about this man? can you believe the story he s telling? i was supposed to pick her up twice and she was so out of character, she didn t show up on either day. the evidence whisperer wasn t present at either of those interviews, but watching them helped him solve the mystery of
end? enter this guy. he sees things other cops don t see? phenomenal. they call him the evidence whisperer. he s about to crack this case open before your eyes. the answer was in the details? it was right there. and you won t believe how. you walk out of there thinking, i spooked him, it worked? i hoped. i wasn t quite sure. hello. welcome to dateline. 20-year-old lindsey eckland and her mother nancy told each other everything, or so her mother believed. when the college vanished after a night out clubbing nancy thought she was at a sleepover with friends, and it wasn t the only secret lindsey was hiding. it would take years for detectives to uncover the truth buried in a pile of lies, but could they find lindsey? here is josh mankowicz with the