into i don t want to get into individual attacks, but i would say take the republican paespaeshrty not an attack. just an assessmen mmt. i don t expect you to attack him. an assessment. you can have your o mpinion of w someone is handling things without attacking them. the way he s handling this. a head in the sand approach. let s see where he ends up at the end because sometimes he s unpredictable and i just don t like talking about individual members. it s not something that i m comfortable with. what i will tell you is about this whistle-blower, this notion that somehow we re going to expose a whistle-blower, and by the way, the whistle-blower came out with a bunch of things that have now been corroborated, a bunch of it yesterday by taylor and kent. you re going to hear more. be really interesting to see what sondland has to say. let me just suggest to you that the whistle-blower law, something that i voted for when i was a member of congress, this cannot be violated. i mea
because he called in the tip. but not if the man is guilty. and removed from office. i m sure in your situation the police may know who he is. that doesn t need the person needs to be outed or publicly testified because they called in the tip. right? well, we have a whistleblower law. very weak. they get out. the republicans and members of the president s own family have said they want to know the man s name. and think he s a man. and if harm comes to that man, because he s been publicly outed. in a way that is not essential to the quality of the whether donald trump will be removed or not. if harm comes to him, millions of americans will never forgive them and see they re punished for that crime. because it is a crime. these will be the first impeachment hearings in the age
that s the important thing. he may have hated my client. the important thing is the quality of the evidence. guilt or innocence. not the tip. the whistleblower was important because he called in the tip. but not if the man is guilty. and removed from office. i m sure in your situation the police may know who he is. that doesn t need the person needs to be outed or publicly testified because they called in the tip. right? well, we have a whistleblower law. very weak. they get out. the republicans and members of the president s own family have said they want to know the man s name. and think he s a man. and if harm comes to that man, because he s been publicly outed. in a way that is not the essential to the quality of the whether donald trump will be removed or not. if harm comes to him, millions
out for the public to decide for themselves or to see what s going on with the u.s. whistleblower law that protects the whistleblower in even keeps the identity anonymous if he does the the right approach. i think if there is the danger retaliate in which that often has been you know if it is sane to be it often the case that whistleblowers are retaliated against if the by the. organizational their company then in some instances i think it should be anonymous but i think we need to move beyond this we need to move beyond. a place where whistleblowers a seen as extraordinary and we need to move in a direction where bringing information to the public which is necessary for the public to know what is going on behind the scenes that should be seen as something to be sort of protected and respected and given proper
and britain wanted to attack iraq with the support of a u.n. resolution when the u.s. struggled to get support the country s national security agency asked british intelligence to try and win over 6 uncommitted nations on the security council and h a h e c h q katherine gun received the directive but didn t agree eventually she had it sent to britain s observer newspaper which then revealed the plan on march 4th 2003 . that caused the scandal in britain and beyond. simply understand i m not going to comment on the operations of our security services but i do say this we act in accordance with the mystic and international law and we act in the best interests of this country and all security services are a vital part of the protection of this country a couple of weeks later the americans british and other coalition forces then decided to attack iraq without the backing of