Page 2 - Windows Holding News Today

Extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an a...

Work that is proposed currently and additionally, and a letter from mr. Morton was received yesterday after the publication of the report further out lying the concerns regarding the proposed work and a copy is available for the public and also been forwarded to the commission. And specifically the letter raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project ...

From seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the prev...

Facade and pattern for the side and the proportion and based again on the photographic evidence and that the north and south side elevations will be appropriate on the secondary elevations of the building and will be painted to match the finish as conditioned. Based on these findings, the Department Recommends the approval with the following conditions of approval, revised drawings should be included as part of the building submital and including the attachment details for the rail on the roof a...

Be included as part of the Building Permit submital and including the windows that closely match the configuration and all exterior profiles of the buildings based on the historic photographic evidence. And after issuance of the Building Permit and prior to installation, a mockup of the metal and the materials and integral cover or finish shall be reviewed and approved by the department preservation staff and more of a stucco finish shall be reviewed at the project site and on proved by the Depa...

Directors announcements. Good afternoon, commissioners, tim, the Department Staff and directors announcements are included in his report in your packet and i am happy to answer any questions if you have them. Any questions . Seeing none . Item two, review of passed weeks of the Planning Commission and the staff report and announcements. Good afternoon, commissioners, tim, Department Staff, a couple of items to share with you, in correspondence whether there is a memo from mary brown of our staff...

The reduced size of the roof deck and the substantial set back provided from the edges of the building, the new roof top additions appear to be minimally visible and will not result on the additional impact on the roof. Based on the reveal of the proposed drawings and the specifickations it plans to meet it for the article plan for the following reasons and that the use of stucco finish is appropriate given that the building was finished in stucco prior to 1958 as documented in for by the photog...

Raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area an...

Slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area and penthouses on the roof. The current proposal is an attempt by the new owners of the building to finish construction that was started by the previous owner, and it will not remove additional historic fabric from the building. This will replace the historic fabric that was previously removed with the compatible replacement material to bring back the building and still convey the building as a resource....

Raises the concern that as proposed, when you try the extent of any alterations do not meet the standards and are to contend and cannot be exempt from seca. It should be noted that the project was evaluated in 2005 after the removal of the materials except for the montgomery street and had received a certificate of approval. The project was received an exemption at that time. The current proposal is a slight modification. Includes the stucco and as well as adding a much smaller roof deck area an...