Page 884 - Wisdom News Today

Years old, in order to move forward with charges. and as as long as its within that period, you can. the whole reason of statute of limitations is memories fade and witnesses are not as available as they may be so you have those. so the there are significant challenges in moving forward in terms of where it happened, when it happened, what you remember happened, what the specifics of it are. but certainly, in my view, challenges in the defense case as well. >> okay. so on that, you are a crimina...

Weird. and receipts and everything else. there is an explanation. were all going, i cant believe -- >> anything is possible. >> lets not go from one to the other. in this situation ordinarily there would be responsible attorneys coming forward, pleading for him to have his day in court and asking people not to rush to judgment unless there is a massively shocking exculpatory evidence, i question the wisdom of letting him go out and say, i am completely innocent after yesterday. >> when i heard t...

Joining us now is walter dellinger. he served our country as head of the office of legal counsel as well as acting solicitor general under president clinton. professor dellinger, thank you so much for being with us tonight. >> you are welcome. >> so its accepted as common wisdom in the news business and i think in general right now that the president cannot face indictment because of justice department policy that precludes that. as someone who used to run the office that creates that kind of po...

Contemporaneous commentary of those who were there and saw how it was written, its interesting to see that common wisdom being challenged. one of the things thats fascinating to watch over the last few weeks and months is high-ranking democrats in congress quietly but steady calling question whether internal justice department policy based on the 1973 memo, whether justice department policy really does definitively preclude an indictment against a sitting president. democrats expressing doubt ab...

The new 2019 ford edge joining us now is wallet de dellinger. he served thanks for joining us tonight. >> you are welcome. >> so its accepted as common wisdom in the news business and i think in general right now that the president cannot face indictment because of justice department policy that precludes that. as someone who used to run the office that creates that kind of policy at the justice department, how solid do you see that policy as being? >> you know, i dont think its at all solid. ...

Accept, that a sitting president is immune from indictment. except maybe we havent all come to accept it. i mean, looking back at the thinness of these foundations and the contemporaneous commentary of people who were there and saw how that stuff was written, its interesting to see now that common wisdom being challenged. one of the things that has been fascinating to watch just over the last few weeks and months is high-ranking democrats in congress quietly but steadily starting to call to call...

A the parking lot proving no job is too big and the pop is too small. her owner gabby was accidentally blocked it out of the house. you are the midnight heroes. and the rest of you are too. we will see you tomorrow night, thanks for joining us. ♪ >> tucker: fox news alert, chicago police announce dramatis chicago police announce dramatis smollett case, no longer considered the victim of a crime, seconds ago, he was charged, felony charges, for filing a false police report. all the developments...

So i think you have democrats on capitol hill who arent just going to be able to dismiss these things just because theres no easy answer to what to do about a presidential pattern and practice of trying to obstruct and shutdown all of the investigations against him, as far as i can tell. at some point congress is likely going to be forced to grapple with whether that rises to the level of something that is impeachable. i just think that although its become a little bit political conventional wis...

Mueller investigation, both to pursue its own investigations and to move forward regardless of what happens. its still not entirely clear, of course, what the mechanism is by which the mueller findings would be transmitted. as shimon pointed out we dont know what the status of the southern district of new yorks potential new obstructions like that in "the new york times" report today, would that also flow into these investigations? so i think you have democrats on capitol hill who arent just goi...

Before liberal attorney generals took aim at president trumps latest move to get his wall funded by the conventional wisdom from commentators seems to settle on a simple conclusion, it is unconstitutional. but is it? here now is a true expert on the issue, john ekman, constitutional law professional. your response to those glib summations of the unconstitutionality of the presidents move? >> if there hadnt a congressional statute that authorized what he was doing, but every president since 1976 ...