witness intimidation: Live & Latest News Updates : Vimarsana.com
that first witness would be so they could properly prepare, and there was a real reluctance to actually give over that name because they were concerned that donald trump would perhaps tweet about it, that would perhaps tweet about it, that would again raise concerns for witness intimidation. donald trump us lawyers had promised, tell us who the witnesses and we won't even tell donald trump, our client, or have him post about it. so that was an interesting point that came up, again the unprecedented nature of this trial is certainly testing the legal system. with all of these delays, it would be difficult to see us getting to the first witness, we will have to see how that plays out. larger picture, we have all come to see that with this case, we have to be prepared for the unexpected. donald trump us lawyers would certainly welcome any delays, they had already complained thatjury
Donald-trumpWitnessItConcernsReluctanceNameLawyersUsWitnessesNatureClientWitness-intimidation
>> sandra: we know where this is going next, followed it minute-by-minute, today. the jurors sworn in, the prosecution as of monday, it was confirmed today they will be able to start making their case, emily. >> emily: and the question is sort of, will the defense be able to make their case? when you post that hypothetical that you would have your lawyers make the case for you and if rules are set in place and you don't obey, naturally incarceration is the next step, but the question is one of the rules are unfair? what if they are totally rigged against you? what if the applications of those rules are totally faulty and by that i mean as trump's defense have tried to, for example, some of subpoena stormy daniels this week so they can get public information that is in that, interestingly-released documentary just in time for her till they make a lot of money. that was called witness intimidation and harassment. the question remains, how can trump's defense team adequately and accurately defend themselves when they are being blocked, i argue, from even assessing the information? how is it that the defendant's gag ordered but the star witness
Isn-t-itEmily-cSandra-smithQuestionCaseDefenseJurorsProsecutionSworn-inRulesStepPlace
speaking, a higher likelihood that something happens to one like a kid gets sick or something or whatever, you're making the same, are you making the same arguments to all 17? >> yes. if you take the 12 plus two, five, or is there a strategy to somehow target people like one big blank through all the same person and gerald sends them in the jury room. >> high likelihood that some of those alternates are making on they're going to take the alternate selection as seriously as the selection for the regular john you have to envision the fact that there's going to be a family emergency. there's going to be witness intimidation. there's gonna be someone who gets ill. and so you have to look at the collective pool and as an alternate, that's a juror& so to that extent, there actually are juror we saw what happened. there was seven jurors at the start of the de then there were five right. now, this 12 plus an alternate. and so i think that the entirety of the jury the pool two authors point, you speak to all kristen, joey jackson, monopolist the bill. that's all right. thanks for coming in. really appreciate it i never election year, this wouldn't surprise most of you
SomethingPeopleArgumentsYesStrategyLikelihoodPlus-twoSameBlankKid1217
to hearing the case. >> sandra: we know where this is going next, followed it minute-by-minute, today. the jurors sworn in, the prosecution as of monday, it was confirmed today they will be able to start making their case, emily. >> emily: and the question is sort of, will the defense be able to make their case? when you post that hypothetical that you would have your lawyers make the case for you and if rules are set in place and you don't obey, naturally incarceration is the next step, but the question is one of the rules are unfair? what if they are totally rigged against you? what if the applications of those rules are totally faulty and by that i mean as trump's defense have tried to, for example, some of subpoena stormy daniels this week so they can get public information that is in that, interestingly-released documentary just in time for her till they make a lot of money. that was called witness intimidation and harassment. the question remains, how can trump's defense team adequately and accurately defend themselves when they are being blocked, i argue, from even assessing the information? how is it that the defendant's gag ordered but the star witness
Emily-cSandra-smithIsn-t-itQuestionCaseJurorsProsecutionSworn-inPlaceRulesDefenseStep