Summary This conversation explores the historical context of evangelical opposition to the civil rights movement and draws parallels to contemporary rhetoric. The discussion highlights the similarities between the language used by Charlie Kirk and historical figures who opposed civil rights legislation. It also examines the theological justifications used to discredit the movement and the role of lay preaching in the civil rights movement. The conversation concludes with a reflection on the future of evangelicalism and the ongoing fight for racial justice. Takeaways There is a historical pattern of evangelical opposition to civil rights, with similar rhetoric and justifications used throughout history. The language used by Charlie Kirk echoes the discourse of historical figures who opposed civil rights legislation. Theological justifications, such as the belief in individual salvation and the idea that revival will solve racial issues, have been used to oppose civil rights. Lay preachi