the problem with miners starts when the soviet union was over. and in europe the social democracy was over. and the last strike was five years ago. the miners were the last soldiers of the working-class movement. in the last strike, the airport was closed by the miners. the highway, the sea too. they closed asturias. everybody in the streets, screaming. and the miners stayed in the fight, and the war is over when one side wins. they win. we lose. and for me that was the end of anthony: the end of organized labor.
it starts when it was over and the social demographic was over. the miners were the last soldiers for working class movement. the airport was closed by the miners. everybody was like screaming. the miners stay in the fight. the war is over when one side win.
when the soviet union was over. and in europe the social democracy was over. and the last strike was five years ago. the miners were the last soldiers of the working-class movement. in the last strike, the airport was closed by the miners. the highway, the sea too. they closed asturias. everybody in the streets, screaming. and the miners stayed in the fight, and the war is over when one side wins. they win. we lose. and for me that was the end of anthony: the end of organized labor.
pablo: yes, but of course working class fight is over, they win. we lose. the problem with miners starts when the soviet union was over. and in europe the social democracy was over. and the last strike was five years ago. the miners were the last soldiers of the working-class movement. in the last strike, the airport was closed by the miners. the highway, the sea too. they closed asturias. everybody in the streets, screaming. and the miners stayed in the fight, and the war is over when one side wins. they win. we lose. and for me that was the end
which is maybe rick saccone can eke this out. if that s the case he ll turn back and say, yeah, maybe it was the politics of resentment that ended up being the motivator again and trumped this whole nation of a working class movement and renaissance. but even if that is the case and rick a cone winnone wins b s rick a cone winaccone wins by a two and steve you would know this it s hard to interpret that as a major victory so much as a sigh of relief for republicans. this is a district that is, to remind the viewer, 20 plus trump in 2016. could the republican party conceivably take a close rick saccone win and do other than put gloss on it and say well, we escaped that one? wouldn t it theoretically be a huge problem if they only win by one or two points? it would fall into the same category as what we saw last year in a of special elections,