they want to talk more about sort the economic stuff, tax cuts, health care, and sort of things that they can actually offer voters because i think to some voters, the russia investigation feels sort of above their heads at a 30,000 foot level that they re not necessarily thinking about day to day. i think the democrats are aware of that. michael, that s what i hear from a lot of democrats, that they feel politically if they re talking about health care, they may be scoring more political points than if they re talking about mueller, if they re talking about the investigation. from a republican perspective, what is a worse issue to be talking about for a candidate, i guess? defending trying to do away with obamacare or defending the president on mueller? well, i think it depends on what part of the country you re from. certainly if you re, you know, a west coast or an east coast republican, you don t want to be having conversations about donald trump and investigations and muelle
comply with the conditions of bond now that he has breached it in a very serious way. and, chuck rosenberg, from the standpoint of mueller, of the investigation that really sort of started all this, the question, the issue that s been raised here is does it make it more likely for paul manafort to want to cooperate, to want to seek some kind of a deal with the special counsel? from mueller s standpoint, do you think those odds in his mind went up because of that? well, yes and no, steve, and here s why. paul manafort was already facing a lot of counts and a lot of time in jail. he had every incentive. he has every incentive to cooperate. that hasn t really changed very much. what s changed is that he was on bond, and now he s not. so i think the calculation perhaps changes slightly. perhaps it sharpens his senses a bit. perhaps it brings the question to the fore. but in the main, no. he s always had incentive to
of what may have led manafort to hold out as long as he has in negotiating with the special counsel s office. you know, chuck, i guess when we talk about the possibility of some kind of a deal, some kind of cooperation from paul manafort, it presumes that he has information that mueller and the special counsel s team would find valuable, would find useful. the president, you know, has been insisting there is nothing to the idea of collusion between his campaign, between his sort of political orbit and russia. if that is correct, if that is true what the president has been asserting and paul manafort couldn t shine any light on that subject, would he be of any value to the special counsel s team in terms of cooperating? my guess is he probably would, but it s just a guess, steve. look, not every defendant has information that s valuable. but the way the united states sentencing guidelines are constructed and those are the guidelines that help the court, the judge fashion a sentenc
all in has obtained exclusive new details on some of the 2,000 children taken from their parents at the boarder. this is where at least 65 kids, 65 migrant children from central america are living. when all in starts right now. good evening from new york. i m chris hayes. the former campaign chairman to the president of the united states is behind bars. he s behind bars for allegedly colluding with a suspected russian agent to sub on perjury and obstruct justice while he was under house arrest. today a judge in washington, d.c. revoked manafort s bail after the special counsel accused him of tampering with witnesses while he was out under house arrest filing new obstruction of charges against manafort against konstantin kilimnik, who is believed to have ties to russian intelligence. the judge sent manafort to jail to await his two upcoming trials
active ties to the russian military intelligence that he wants to make himself whole as your previous guest talked about oleg deripaska because he owed him $18.9 million. how is he going to make him whole? he offered him private briefings on the status of the trump campaign. i would think a private briefing of just a news letter is not going to be worth $18.9 million. you would think it s worth something much more than that. that s another data point. another is if you look through the papadopoulos plea agreement there are a lot of signals from mueller. papadopoulos is told by a russian agent in april of 2016 the russians have dirt on hillary clinton in the form of thousands of e-mails. prior this is key prior to any of it being public. the public has no idea about this. that s what s so significant about that disclosure. yeah, absolutely. that s in april. adam schiff, representative adam schiff on your show says if you