Latest Breaking News On - World news editor - Page 15 : vimarsana.com

essence to make that determination. well, here s another possibility in this very vast rough part of the ocean, it is quite possible, according to experts, that search crews could miss these floating objects simply because of the fallibility of the human eye and the possibility that these pieces could essentially just blend in with the water. as one expert told me today historically visual search has about a 78% probability for detection in that first search, and that s in the best case scenario meaning the water is flat and calm, but when you have a lot of wave action like you have there in the indian ocean, of course, that probability of detecting it first time around, it decreases, wolf. certainly does. it s a very, very dangerous and very difficult operation. rene marsh reporting, thank you. let s dig a little bit deeper. our justice correspondent pamela brown is still with us. new york times reporter michael schmidt joins us. and the world news editor for usa today. and th

Human eyeSearch crewsCase scenarioWolf blitzerIndian ocean search zoneWave actionUsa todayTom fuentesPamela brownWorld news editorMichael schmidtRene marsh reportingNew york times