Page 45 - Wouldnt It News Today

Susan rice did this specifically just foror trump officials, she did it during the transition, she did it with a high frequency all the way through the transition effort after trump was elected, and then she widely disseminated the unmasked name. thats where i think she got caught. >> sean: wouldnt it be a felony at that point? >> she released these names to other people at the state department who were clear at this, so that wouldnt be illegal to dobu that. but the only reason to unmask a name ...

Office, donald trump sets in motion a way to surveilled the incoming president or then candidate of the opposition party. do you think the news media would be treating at the same way they are doing now? > i dont, and i agree. i havent seen evidence of russia collusion with the trump campaign, ive spoken to former top obama intel officials who say they havent seen evidence of that either. and i do think theres a very different treatment by the news media in general between the two allegations, ...

Six years. the initial bill did not do that. i think the bills getting closer. i think we should thank the house of freedom caucus for actually not bowing? bowing down and taking any bill. it has fought tooth and nail and taking a lot of barbs from a lot of establishment republicans but are making the bill better. i think theres a chance c we nd to get to a good bill but we should take the house freedom caucus for that. >> sean: you and i agree on that. they were unfairly maligned, and from what...

We are not even talking about them and you keep dodging questions about them like they dont matter. and they do matter. >> im telling you directly, if you care about that sector of the labor economy, theres something you can do. talk to your republican allies and tell them to pass conference of immigration reform and get people work authorizations, so they cant be exploited in ways that are harmful to our economy. >> tucker: wouldnt it just be a lot simpler to acknowledge the law of supply and d...

Something happened. semantics. the question is, as a surveillance, wiretap, or whatever." meantime, homeland security its exactly the same as obamacare. secretary kelly saying weve talked about it personall president trump must have a valid reason to make such a personally, meghan. claim. >> if the president the united states said hes got reason to say it, hes got some why pay the penalty? sort of convincing evidence that because it made more sense to took place. me. thats the truth. when i look...

People are forced to buy insurance instead of the irs collecting it, and now goes to the insurance company collecting. at this mandate on owning insurance, thats the biggest problem. at the cadillac tax. another thing we talked about for years. attacks on higher priced insurance plans. thats still in play, it just doesnt get addressed for a couple years down the road. medicaid expansion. this is basically another entitlement program. one of the biggest things that they need to do is they need to...

I fault these guys because they know this is the one thing that will drive costs down. a >> sandra: go back to sean spicers words saying if its surveillance, wiretap, or whatever. theyre throwing summing on the there is reporting that strongly suggests something occurred. table saying, well make it better, but will negotiate. he, and secretary kelly are suggesting that the president has some sort of evidence to make this claim, should they >> eboni: the 20 million show us? people for better or w...

Out of control. in fact, they knowledged in their own bill by putting an insurance company bailout, a $100 billion at least because the market place still broken. >> chuck schumer is already attacking it, calling it trunk care. no surprise, trying to get rid of obamacare has drawn a lot of attention here on capitol hill. some republicans now nervous and it democrats are strongly opposed. >> sandra: thank you for that. it lets turn it over to eric bolling now. you have been a big fan of donald tr...

Youre right, eric, some of the rhetoric coming off of the campaign of donald trump will still hurt him ultimately. >> harris: we are only talk about the efficacy of the order. >> eboni: the bench will say its time to interpret intent. that is their job. it they will indeed look to the things that have been said in its totality. >> sandra: eric schneiderman, a democratic who joined the legal fight. he said "why white house may have added changes to the ban, the intent to discriminate against musl...

Some negotiation ground. which is fine, but your disappointment about how this >> harris: wouldnt it be plan doesnt meet with confidential and classified? we can talk about leaks, but how expectations is valid. far do you want? >> eric: its a very simple answer, allowing insurance >> eboni: obviously i wouldnt companies to compete for your want to compromise the business. safeguards around what we talk the compete with each other by about, but i do firmly believe giving you cheaper insurance. ju...