our foreign policy. i was speaking this morning with someone from the administration. they ve been trying to get basic things to the syrian national coalition. the new opposition group of more moderate people. they a proposal to give them ambulances, generators, search and rescue equipment when the scud missiles quit. wr e so terrified giving aid to any islamist it takes us forever to actually deliver the aid. bite time we actually gelt our aid and try to bolster moderates, all those on the ground have started growing beards and gee hauftist come in, decisive, throw money around. but everyone in the state department is so afraid and the white house of slipping up and creating an opportunity that the republicans will pounce on, and the press, too, that we re just pa paralyzed, tied in knots. the red line comment many times over the use of chemical weapons in syria. has the white house painted itself into a corner now that there s an acknowledgement chemical weapons have likely been
outrageous types of questions, and then the next question from the reporter is why are you talking so much about social issues? isn t it fair for journalists to ask the senator about his own words. the situation in syria turns deadly for more correspondents trying to cover the violent uprising there. breaking news into cnn just minutes ago. word that the two western journalists, including an american, have been killed in syria. will the dangers there choke off the flow of news from syria? plus, the sniping has already started over the movie game change even before it airs on hbo. you can actually see russia from land here in alaska. my god. what have we done? it wasn t my fault. i wasn t properly prepped. are sarah palin s people justified in going ballistic? i m howard kurtz, and this is reliable sources. the campaign debate over rick santorum and the exit tent to which he should or should not be talking about religion and social issues has quickly morphed
cour in tacr tup isco in.ur neyillco. lelyulen goveorlcott lye wker ve ntrorsiatt leglati. w r e cntylerk ronnouiaed theegti di covery ofrk 14,0ouhencoued diteser sfin it4,asou suote st manterror n.or. vickhat ourprecis. doouhink thi ckhingt rasci do nklegs hi it dsn toundng lik iill be gs resitved dytim tndik il esd imoon. he wer t fndn. balts. ther wer fe aeady coued tal. th erball as.dy ou t wh hapneds the pson ll wh apiledd theepor pnrookeld sconn to ed t t assiateor ess. ok dshe d no onailto tsste s. e noountlrook nt feediscoin. e faed trint tmokp o ed theporco . don thifa tnt it tas o thor onhit leg shnon:his reqst cam ieg shn:seqam
municipalities, and other governmental bodies can negotiate something above that. but everybody, once any of their collective bargain contracts that expire that are currently in force, everybody s got to pay at least 1.5%. so we re starting towards the idea that it s a contribution society and not an entitlement society. governor, we ve heard recently from a lot of well-respected columnists, wr e writing columns or teaching at universities saying this moment in our economic history requires more spending and more taxes. we ve got to keep pushing money into this. that s one philosophy. can you just lay out your basic philosophy? mine is we buried ourselves under all this spending and taxes and we need to free up people s own entrepreneurial spirit, free up their willingness and their desire and the incentive for them to work even harder to put more of their own capital at risk in order to grow private sector jobs. i just think that the model that we re seeing is a failed model. and