My name is gabriel wolf. Thank you for a very interesting presentation. I understand that every selfdriving car has to know where it is at any time. Is it necessary for others . My question is, do self driving cars have to be tracked . That is what i think i understood him to say. They have to be tracked and be connected and there ways they will be tracked in that sense. Maybe mark or randall, do you have an answer to that . Publicly the way the current manufacturers envision this, they want to focus on Sensor Technology so there will be a gps receiver so the car will know where it is relative to other things. The sensors are there doing. You will be able to pull up a screen and see where they are. I dont think they will know where another selfdriving car is. I dont think thats necessary. Tracking is not a part of the technology that is being developed by any of the companies that i know about. Question at the back . My name is Kathleen Shannon from the university of virginia law schoo
Type of threatening coercion that doesnt really fit in the relationship between sovereigns. This 39 School Corporations who have joined, i was talking to a few people in the hall. They are usually not standing next to me during my election process. Lets leave it at that. But they were very concerned about the way we educate our children and the way our School Corporations as a part of our sovereign government has been structured. We have a school board. They elect the people who run the school and they use parttime workers. So its bus drivers, the teachers aid, people that work in the cafeteria. Under indianas law, 30 hours or 37 1 2 hours, anything less than that is parttime. Were going to have our last keynote address and then we will break for lunch, which will be held upstairs on the second floor. Our final speaker of the day is the attorney general of oklahoma, scott pruitt. He holds the merit of he holds the distinction of seeing the merit in this litigation before any other atto
But you wouldnt have to reach that question in this case and i would concede to you Justice Kennedy, that would be a debatable argument under why would it be any more debatable than the argument youre making here . I more or less anticipated your answer. I think that has to be your answer. I think you have to tell us even if the good faith exclusionary rule applies, mistake of law just doesnt count. Thats not exactly what this courts jurisprudence holds. The court is held that reasonableness can be taken into account at the remedy stage the question is why isnt that a problem for you when you say there cannot be a reasonable mistake of law . We know there can be. Theres a difference, Justice Kennedy, between rights. When you ask the question what is reasonable as to whether or not the Fourth Amendment was violated, both in the jurisprudence in criminal cases and in qualified amunty cases, you do that against the construct interpretation of the law. Were talking about whether as a categ
Proposed new hair salon for Retford is among this week's planning applications worksopguardian.co.uk - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from worksopguardian.co.uk Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.