that s funny. that s a long time ago. that s how long we have known each other. sean: there like 100 lights blaring in my face. laura: we will pick it up where you left off. we will try. i am laura ingraham, this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. in a moment we will speak to one of donald trump s attorney is about ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but first, now since august 8th, the day of the raid on mar-a-lago, the end has been very clear, to at least half of the country this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn t grounded and some knee-jerk dislike of the rank-and-file fbi, but it s recent history. specifically the crusade waged by the deep state against donald trump from 2015 and onward. a two-tiered system of justice, one standard for hunter and hillary, and another for donald trump. fast forward to present day when donald trump took another turn. the u.s. magistrate reinhard bart of jeffrey epstein fame,
trump and its allies to account for actual evidence. while, joining us now to clear things up, christina, thanks for being here tonight. you are in court today when the magistrate ruled. i m curious about why you chose not to file an official motion or join another motion arguing this affidavit as you gave it a desire as he stated it for full transparency. he did say that, you re exactly right, we believe the judicial office of the party had argued quite well and we believe it was very interesting and encouraging that you had parties from both sides of the aisle of course outlets coupled with conservative lifestyle group together on the same side. and see how that played out reserving the rights to try something else in the future, and really just chose to see how it will play out.
that s funny. that s a long time ago. that s how long we have known each other. sean: there like 100 lights blaring in my face. laura: we will pick it up where you left off. we will try. i am laura ingraham, this is the ingraham angle from washington tonight. in a moment we will speak to one of donald trump s attorney is about ongoing battle over the release of the affidavit. but first, now since august 8th, the day of the raid on mar-a-lago, the end has been very clear, to at least half of the country this investigation appears to be tainted by politics. now the belief isn t grounded and some knee-jerk dislike of the rank-and-file fbi, but it s recent history. specifically the crusade waged by the deep state against donald trump from 2015 and onward. a two-tiered system of justice, one standard for hunter and hillary, and another for donald trump. fast forward to present day when
laura: i understand that you chose to do that, but i m wondering, are you not concerned that because you did not join any of these motions for again the full relief of this affidavit that you are then waving possible objections to the way reductions are being done by the justice department later on, because he did not speak today nor did you join any of these motions and they will redact all of this stuff and am not sure what grounds you are going to have at this point having waived your right to file those motions. we would maintain that we have not waived our right to that that is still maintained. we need to wait and see. i can be certain at this point, because we have not seen the affidavit and certainly have not seen the reductions and how it will play out, but we will be making that decision as it comes out. you know, we have to see it. we have not seen it and it has been under sale, so i don t know. we can t say.
donald trump took another turn. the u.s. magistrate reinhard bart of jeffrey epstein fame, had reductions on certain lines of the affidavit which then will be released to the public perhaps late next week. various media organizations have petitioned the court to make public the full affidavit without any reduction. but of course the doj opposed the affidavits release making these broad claims at releasing even limited parts of the affidavit could create dangers for witnesses were future cooperations and also reveal key investigative methods. and for obvious dramatic effect, they drew in reference to national security stakes. none of that however seems compelling given what is at stake here. the public strikes to know along with the need to address skepticism in favor of releasing the entire affidavit.